- Nate Serg
TRANSCENDENCE
Study: ‘Virus’ Is Identical to Normal Cell ‘Structures’
...another nail in the coffin for the existence of SARS-CoV-2. The paper is titled “Appearances Can be Deceiving – Viral-like Inclusions in Covid-19 Negative Renal Biopsies by Electron Microscopy.” The authors are Clarrisa A. Cassol, et al., and the citation is Kidney360 1:824-828, 2020. This is a peer-reviewed journal affiliated with the American Society of Nephrology; in other words, this paper comes squarely from what is called acceptable, mainstream science.
Many of you have probably seen the electron-micrograph pictures of SARS-CoV-2, the ones in black and white, with the black dots within the faint outline of the circle. I have attached two such images from papers that claim these photos show direct evidence of the existence of the virus. These are the pictures that virologists show us, not the computer-generated, colorful images that you see in magazines and on the internet. These are the “real” pictures of the virus, and they are offered as “proof” that the virus exists.
However, it turns out these photos are actually NOT corona viruses, and the CDC, among others, has known this fact since at least 2004. The above paper examines the evidence used to claim that these images represent viruses, rather than normal “structures” within a cell, particularly sick cells. Here is what the paper says:
“We have observed morphologically indistinguishable inclusions within podocytes and tubular epithelial cells both in patients negative for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as well as in renal biopsies from the pre-COVID-19 era” (emphasis added).
In other words, the researchers saw these same structures in people with no evidence of Covid and in samples they took before Covid even happened, before the virus was said to even exist.
In addition, they say:
“We postulated that endogenous mimickers could be present that are morphologically indistinguishable from SARS-CoV-2 virions ultrastructurally.”
And:
“Viral-like inclusions, consisting both of single vesicles with diameters between 50 and 138 nm, as well as packed groups within larger vesicles, were found in all 15 cases, either in podocytes. Tubular epithelia, or vascular epithelial cells (figure 1).”
In all 15 cases that they examined, they found structures identical to what is being called SARS-CoV-2. They were scattered all over the kidneys and blood vessels; they are not viruses, but normal parts of the cells.
Then they go on to describe how these particles come about:
“A number of potential natural mimickers that can generate intracellular groups of round vesicles mimicking
SARS-CoV-2 virions could be listed, the most likely being endocytic vesicles and endosomal components such as microvesicular bodies containing exosomes, among others. Endocytosis leads to the formation of 60-120 nm vesicles, which is within the size range described for SARS-CoV-2 (60-140nm). These endocytic vesicles may be coated by different proteins, one of the most common being clathrin. The presence of coating proteins may be responsible for the presence of an electron-dense area surrounding these vesicles, giving the appearance of a viral corona.”
In other words, remember the famous “corona” on the corona virus? It turns out it’s just a common protein coating on normal vesicles, picking up the dyes in the electron-microscope preparation. The corona appearance is just another creative fiction, dreamed up by virologists and their graphic design teams.
Finally, the paper goes on to say that, naturally, you see more of these particles in sick people than in healthy people, which is exactly what I have been suggesting this past year. Dead and dying cells make these particles in the dying process and partly to get rid of poisons.
But the final nail comes in this quote:
“The potential for confusion of coronavirus particles with normal cellular components was in fact highlighted in a detailed ultrastructural study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of SARS-CoV responsible for the 2003 SARS outbreak.”[1]
In other words, the CDC in 2004 knew that researchers couldn’t reliably know these particles were coronavirus particles. Not a word has been heard about this since. All virologists use these pictures as proof of the existence of this virus. It is a fraud, based on junk science, like everything else connected with “Covid 19.”
_________________________
(Note from e-mailer ; Not once have i seen any paper that does not use a cell cuture (Vero 6, or FBS with antibiotics ) to claim "isolation". From what is growing enormously evident, they have attempted to affrim the consequent or commited fraud. )
________
Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI)
Isolation: The action of isolating; the fact or condition of being isolated or standing alone; separation from other things or persons; solitariness.
– Oxford English Dictionary
The controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been isolated or purified continues. However, using the above definition, common sense, the laws of logic and the dictates of science, any unbiased person must come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated or purified. As a result, no confirmation of the virus’ existence can be found. The logical, common sense, and scientific consequences of this fact are:
the structure and composition of something not shown to exist can’t be known, including the presence, structure, and function of any hypothetical spike or other proteins;
the genetic sequence of something that has never been found can’t be known;
“variants” of something that hasn’t been shown to exist can’t be known;
it’s impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19.
In as concise terms as possible, here’s the proper way to isolate, characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples (blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness. Without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters and ultracentrifuges i.e. the specimen. This common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages1 and so-called giant viruses in every virology lab, then allows the virologist to demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles. These particles are the isolated and purified virus.
These identical particles are then checked for uniformity by physical and/or microscopic techniques. Once the purity is determined, the particles may be further characterized. This would include examining the structure, morphology, and chemical composition of the particles. Next, their genetic makeup is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from the purified particles and using genetic-sequencing techniques, such as Sanger sequencing, that have also been around for decades. Then one does an analysis to confirm that these uniform particles are exogenous (outside) in origin as a virus is conceptualized to be, and not the normal breakdown products of dead and dying tissues.2 (As of May 2020, we know that virologists have no way to determine whether the particles they’re seeing are viruses or just normal break-down products of dead and dying tissues.)3
1 Isolation, characterization and analysis of bacteriophages from the haloalkaline lake Elmenteita, KenyaJuliah Khayeli Akhwale et al, PLOS One, Published: April 25, 2019. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0215734 — accessed 2/15/21
2 “Extracellular Vesicles Derived From Apoptotic Cells: An Essential Link Between Death and Regeneration,” Maojiao Li1 et al, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2020 October 2. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcell.2020.573511/full — accessed 2/15/21
3 “The Role of Extraellular Vesicles as Allies of HIV, HCV and SARS Viruses,” Flavia Giannessi, et al, Viruses, 2020 May
If we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized, and genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle. However, we still have to show it is causally related to a disease. This is carried out by exposing a group of healthy subjects (animals are usually used) to this isolated, purified virus in the manner in which the disease is thought to be transmitted. If the animals get sick with the same disease, as confirmed by clinical and autopsy findings, one has now shown that the virus actually causes a disease. This demonstrates infectivity and transmission of an infectious agent.
None of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called pathogenic virus. Our research indicates that a single study showing these steps does not exist in the medical literature.
Instead, since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material — all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a “virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus isolation.” This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from an actual virus. This is scientific fraud.
The observation that the unpurified specimen — inoculated onto tissue culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic fluid and other tissues — destroys the kidney tissue onto which it is inoculated is given as evidence of the virus’ existence and pathogenicity. This is scientific fraud.
From now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the SARS-CoV-2 virus has been isolated, please check the methods sections. If the researchers used Vero cells or any other culture method, you know that their process was not isolation. You will hear the following excuses for why actual isolation isn’t done:
There were not enough virus particles found in samples from patients to analyze.
Viruses are intracellular parasites; they can’t be found outside the cell in this manner.
If No. 1 is correct, and we can’t find the virus in the sputum of sick people, then on what evidence do we think the virus is dangerous or even lethal? If No. 2 is correct, then how is the virus spread from person to person? We are told it emerges from the cell to infect others. Then why isn’t it possible to find it?
Finally, questioning these virology techniques and conclusions is not some distraction or divisive issue. Shining the light on this truth is essential to stop this terrible fraud that humanity is confronting. For, as we now know, if the virus has never been isolated, sequenced or shown to cause illness, if the virus is imaginary, then why are we wearing masks, social distancing and putting the whole world into prison?
Finally, if pathogenic viruses don’t exist, then what is going into those injectable devices erroneously called “vaccines,” and what is their purpose? This scientific question is the most urgent and relevant one of our time.
We are correct. The SARS-CoV2 virus does not exist.
____________
ONLY POISONED MONKEY KIDNEY CELLS ‘GREW’ THE ‘VIRUS’
Dr. Tom Cowan
October 15, 2020
This week, my colleague and friend Sally Fallon Morell brought to my attention an amazing article put out by the CDC. The link to the article is here, and it was published in June 2020. The purpose of the article was for a group of about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important paper reveals some shocking findings.
First, in the section titled “Whole Genome Sequencing,” we find that rather than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to end, that the CDC “designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512).”
To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves and horn.
The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.
The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I was reading. Let me quote the passage intact:
“Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells. … Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection.”
What does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community? When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible “hosts” or models on which they can test. The first is humans. Exposure to humans is generally not done for ethical reasons and has never been done with SARS-CoV-2 or any coronavirus. The second possible host is animals. Forgetting for a moment that they never actually use purified virus when exposing animals, they do use solutions that they claim contain the virus. Exposure to animals has been done once with SARS-CoV-2, in an experiment that used mice. The researchers found that none of the wild (normal) mice got sick. In a group of genetically modified mice, a statistically insignificant number lost some fur. They experienced nothing like the illness called Covid 19.
The third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue, unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.
The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this “new coronavirus” is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.
My friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.
If people really understood how this “science” was done, I would hope they would storm the gates and demand honesty, transparency and truth.
_______
.... the mystery has not been completely solved yet. Until there is a formal published scientific manuscript, the facts can be argued, particularly regarding causality despite these facts having been officially announced. The data collected so far is not enough to confirm the causal relationship between the new‐type coronavirus and the respiratory disease based on classical Koch's postulates or modified ones as suggested by Fredricks and Relman.
________
Claims vs. reality or facts!
The virus has been isolated – not correct. The virus has never been isolated. (link)
The virus caused the COVID-19. No scientific or experimental evidence has been provided in support of this claim. (link)
The test detects or monitors the virus or infections. Not correct. The test has never been scientifically validated for the intended purpose. (link)
Masks protect from the virus – not valid. There is no scientific evidence available showing that the masks provide protection – none! (link)
Social distance provides protection. No scientific or experimental support is available in support of this claim. (link).
Vaccines are efficacious – not correct. No therapeutics or treatments have been tested (scientifically or experimentally) against the virus. (link)
For further details, see here (link) or (link).
________________________
REMINDER: "SARS-COV-2" has never been properly purified/isolated directly from a sick patient nor proven pathogenic by fulfilling Koch's Postulates.
All this talk of "variants" is nothing more than excuses to cover up the ineffectiveness and illness caused by the rushed, experimental, safety-data-lacking gene therapies masquerading as vaccines as well as to maintain control over your lives through FEAR:
"THE RISE OF THE COVID-19 DELTA VARIANT IN THE U.K. HAS SPARKED FEARS OF A NEW WAVE OF THE VIRUS and could endanger plans for a full reopening of society this month, DESPITE ONE OF THE WORLD'S MOST SUCCESSFUL VACCINATION CAMPAIGNS."
"Recorded cases are nearing levels reached in March this year, with 4,000 to 6,000 cases a day over the last 10 days. THE DELTA VARIANT, first identified in India, IS MORE CONTAGIOUS, SPREADS MORE RAPIDLY AND IS NOW THE DOMINANT STRAIN OF THE VIRUS IN THE U.K.
“WE ARE A COUNTRY WITH A VACCINE-ONLY STRATEGY, and we’ve imported a variant that is more transmissible and MORE LIKELY TO ESCAPE,” said Deepti Gurdasani, a clinical epidemiologist and senior lecturer at Queen Mary University of London, who criticized the absence of other infection control measures, such as masks in schools."
"Other experts like Gurdasani fear that without an effort to lower cases to near zero, FUTURE VARIANTS WILL CONTINUE TO ENDANGER ANY OVERALL LIFTING OF RESTRICTIONS.
“We do need to contain the pandemic if we want to return to normal life, BECAUSE UNLESS WE DO THAT WE WILL BE STUCK IN THIS FOR YEARS,” she said. “WE NEED TO PIVOT FROM LIVING WITH VIRUS TO ELIMINATING VIRUSES ALONGSIDE VACCINE ROLLOUT.”
"Scientists in the U.K. expect that, EVEN WITH PRECAUTIONS, THE DELTA VARIANT WILL CONTINUE TO SPREAD both locally and around the world.
"I think other countries will go down a similar path, and I SUSPECT IT WILL SPREAD GLOBALLY OVER TIME," said Jeff Barrett, director of the Covid-19 Genomics Initiative at the Wellcome Sanger Institute, at a news briefing Wednesday.
"If you look at the U.S. data, it is starting to go up, and I THINK THE U.S. WILL BE THE NEXT PLACE WE WILL SEE A REASONABLE RISE."
Stop letting them manipulate and control your lives through FEAR.
There is no "virus."
There are no "variants."
There is no need for the "vaccine."
There is no need for FEAR.
And there was never any reason to give up any of our FREEDOMS.
___________________________
ISOLATION: the act of separating something from other things : the act of isolating something
This is the definition most people agree with and refer to when isolating something.
Not virologists. This is what virologists mean when using the word isolation:
“VIRUSES ARE BASICALLY INANIMATE OBJECTS WHICH NEED A CULTURE TO ACTIVATE IN. But the way they are phrasing the requests is that the sample must be COMPLETELY UNADULTERATED and not be grown in any culture – AND YOU CAN’T DO THAT,” she told AAP FactCheck in a phone interview.
“YOU CAN'T ISOLATE A VIRUS WITHOUT USING A CELL CULTURE, SO BY USING THEIR DEFINITION IT HASN'T BEEN ISOLATED. But it has been isolated and cultivated using a cell culture multiple times all around the world.”
The above quote is from a FB "factcheck."
In layman's terms, if using the agreed upon definition of isolation, they agree that they haven't isolated a "virus" from everything else as that is impossible. But that's ok because it's a "virus." It needs a host cell (which should be from the host they take the "virus" from but try not to think too hard about that logical inconsistency) in order to grow and replicate. But not just any host cell will do. In the case of "SARS-COV-2," it needs the kidney cells from an African Green Monkey.
But wait, there's more!
It also needs to be immediately placed in "Viral" Transport Media after being taken from a patient. This normally consists of animal DNA, antibiotics, and other chemicals/nutrients. In order to grow, it needs fetal bovine serum (blood taken from the hearts of baby cows). In order to be free of bacteria, it needs 2 or 3 cell toxic antibiotics. In order to "eat," it needs various unknown nutrients/chemicals in DMEM. All of this must be added to the unpurified sample (which in and of itself contains billions of particles) from a patient, mixed together, and then incubated for days.
Once the expected Cytopathogenic Effect (i.e. cell death) is seen in the petri dish, then and only then has a "virus" been "isolated."
Virology subscribes to subtraction through ADDITION. Or, in other words, the EXACT OPPOSITE OF ISOLATION.
So once again, no "virus" has ever been properly purified nor ISOLATED.
This is how you FACTCHECK.
Related Post and Collection on Cell Cultures:
Figure 1: Actual Isolation
Figure 2: Virology "Isolation"
M.Stone - Isolation
Reader comment -
(They have never in WOLRD HISTORY taken an isolated and purified viral sample from a sick patient and directly proven that said sample can make another human sick...this has NOT been done in world history...ever..... all that they have is CPE in culture...this is their proof that viruses exist and are pathogenic....this is all that they have. )
______
STEFFAN LANKA
"Viruses contained in vaccines Die Wurzel: Stefan, let's get back to the virus theory, which is the basis of vaccination. The vaccines used for measles, for example, are called "live" vaccines, although they are anything but living viruses.
How are "live" vaccines constructed and why should they simulate viruses when there are no viruses with independent infectious activity? "Living" and "dead" vaccines Stefan Lanka: Now I understand how you come up with the term "living" viruses. When tissues die in the laboratory during an"infection attempt" in the course of unintentional starvation and poisoning, the people involved believe that these tissues have been transformed into viruses or release viruses. Since the vaccine manufacturers (and their virologists) assume that the mass of dead tissue (i.e., their alleged viruses), which they use as a vaccine, is capable of infection, they speak of a "live vaccine". They believe
Wissenschafftplus Magazin 03/2020
8 that the vaccination virus is still infectious but is attenuated. In contrast, that what is called "inactivated vaccines" is made from the components of alleged viruses; that is, they are not infectious or the decomposing tissue is protected from further decomposition by "preservatives" such as formaldehyde during an infection attempt, in order to use it afterwards as a "inactivated vaccine", as is the case with polio, for example. So: the idea of pathogenic viruses is dead and so is that of vaccination, so the question of "dead" or "alive" is not only misleading, but it is as wrong as the whole concept. Die Wurzel: And secondly, we know that such a "living" vaccine virus cannot occur in nature, so it is not comparable to a wild type of pathogen, right? Domestication of wild type viruses Stefan Lanka: The idea of a wild type of virus is not that of a particularly wild virus, but that the virus has just been spat out fresh from the hell of nature and must first be domesticated by "cultivation" in the laboratory in order to be made accessible for vaccination - science fiction, that is. Here we should also mention the particularly funny but profound article by Jochen Schamal "Kleine Vampirkunde" in the current issue of WissenschafftPlus 2/2020
------------------------------------------------------------
"It is important to mention that this unpurified mixture consisting of dying tissue and cells from monkeys, bovine foetuses and toxic antibiotics, is also being used as a “live” vaccine, because it is supposed to be composed of “attenuated” viruses. The death of tissue and cells – on account of starvation and poisoning and not because of an alleged infection – has continuously been misinterpreted as evidence for the existence of viruses, as evidence for their isolation and as evidence of their propagation.
Thus, the resulting toxic mixture full of foreign proteins, foreign nucleic acids (DNA/RNA), cytotoxic antibiotics, microbes and spores of all types is labelled as a “live vaccine”. It is implanted in children through vaccination mainly into the muscles, in a quantity which if it were injected into the veins would immediately lead to certain death. Only ignorant people who blindly trust in the state authorities who are “testing”and approving the vaccines can regard vaccination as a “small harmless prick”. The verifiable facts demonstrate the danger and negligence of these scientists and politicians, who claim that vaccines are safe, have little or no side-effects and would protect us from a disease. None of these claims is true and scientific, on the contrary: upon precise scientific analysis, one finds that vaccines are useless and the respective literature admits to the lack of any evidence in their favour.
2
_______
(Please check back as new content will get added to this document)
MIKE S - ISOLATION CHEATED
_________
Very detailed - Investigation into the papers of Sars Cov2 / Cell Cultures and the Misconceptions of Virology
__________
7 ways to prove viruses don’t exist with Dr Stefan Lanka
Click this link for the document with illustrations for more clarity --- >
In all seven steps that virologists take to claim a virus, they refuse to adhere to the most important scientific duty, the verification of their methods: They never document control experiments! For this reason alone, statements by virologists claiming that viruses cause disease should never be considered scientific.
If you read the short methods and materials section of the supposedly scientific publications of the virologists, you will see that the virologists have refuted themselves with their explanations of the seven steps.
The ruling in the measles virus trial from 2012 to 2017 contains a meaning that goes beyond the measles compulsory vaccination: This jurisprudence removes the basis of the entire virology.
Dismantling the virus theory The “measles virus” as an example
___________________
The 7 steps to prove viruses do not exist:
1. Virologists interpret the death of cells in the laboratory as viral. Due to the lack of control attempts (experiments), they overlook the fact that they kill the cells in the laboratory themselves and unintentionally by starving and poisoning the cells. This misinterpretation is based on a single publication by John Franklin Enders and a colleague from June 1, 1954. This publication was ruled by the highest court in Germany in the measles virus trial that it contained no evidence of a virus. This publication became the exclusive basis not only for measles virology, but for all virology since 1954 and corona hysteria.
Illustration:
CPE - Control Experiment - 21 April 2021 - English version 4/23/21
Dr Stefan Lanka, a marine & molecular biologist presents some results from the recent control experiments that have been made in regards to the cytopathic effect which "virologists'' look for in their experiments that attempt to prove the existence of "viruses''. The procedure used by all virologists to prove the existence & pathogenicity of so-called “viruses' ' has now been irrefutably debunked by virologist Dr. Stefan Lanka in his latest control experiments. Dr. Lanka reports on the initial findings of his control experiments showing that cell death (CPE) in the virologist’s lab has nothing to do with so-called “viruses'', but rather is due to the starving & poisoning of the cells as per standard protocol. These results officially refute virology.
This is just one control experiment of many where the results will later be published in a scientific journal.
It's time to write off "virology" as another failed hypothesis in the history of science. Interview with Dean Braus
______
Vidoe about the CPE Cyctopathic Effect Control Experiments
_________
2.
Virologists mentally assemble the shortest pieces of so-called genetic information from dying cells to form a very long genetic strand, which they output as the genetic strand of a virus. This conceptual / computational process is called alignment. In doing so, they did not make the control attempts, the attempt to conceptually / computationally construct the desired genetic strand even from short pieces of so-called genetic information from non-infected sources.
Illustration:
3. For the alignment of a virus, virologists always need a given genetic strand of a virus. For this, however, they always use a genetically / computationally generated genetic strand and never a real one, one found in reality. In doing so, they never attempt to check whether or not so-called genetic information could also be constructed from the existing data set, including “viral” genetic material strands of completely different viruses.
Illustration:
Bioinformatics is nebulous. Bioinformaticians do not check whether the results of software processing are found in reality. What Bioinformaticians do is check something that doesn't exist in reality with something that doesn't exist in reality. Virology + Bioinformatics = Zero Science.
Illustration: picture number 3
4. Virologists have never seen or isolated “viruses” in humans, animals, plants or their fluids. They only did it seemingly, indirectly, and only ever by means of very special and artificial cell systems in the laboratory. They never mentioned the control attempts or documented whether they succeeded in depicting and isolating viruses in and from humans, animals, plants or their fluids.
Illustration:
5. Virologists have never isolated, biochemically characterized or obtained their supposed genetic material from the supposed viruses that they photograph using electron microscope images. They have never conducted or published control experiments as to whether, after isolating these structures, it was actually possible to detect “viral” proteins (the envelope of the virus) and, above all, the viral genome, which is supposed to be the central component and characteristic of a virus.
Illustration:
6. Virologists report typical artifacts of dying tissue / cells and typical structures that arise when the cell's own components such as proteins, fats and the solvents used are swirled, as viruses or viral components. Here, too, there are no control experiments with cells / tissues that were not infected but were also treated.
Illustration:
7. The so-called transmission attempts that virologists make to prove the transmission and pathogenicity of the suspected viruses refute the entire virology. Obviously, it is the experiments themselves that trigger the symptoms, which animal experiments provide as evidence of the existence and effectiveness of the suspected viruses. Here, too, there are no control attempts in which exactly the same thing is done, only with non-infected or sterilized materials.
Illustration: warning disturbing video.....
Please inform all relevant institutions in YOUR COUNTRY of these scientific facts. Ask them to inform all their employees. Ask your institutions to tell you if they have checked all of the above and informed their employees. Ask them to answer you as soon as possible. Give them SEVEN DAYS.
Try to understand this text, and YOU can write it in YOUR OWN words.
(SOURCE: translated from German and modified for citizens who are not citizens of the state of Germany.
Pdf link to the 7 steps
Corona receives Three red cards
Tell your authorities that vaccination against alleged sars-cov-2 has no scientific basis. Together we make the house of cards coincide - show the authorities the red card
There is no emperor just his clothes - How to protect yourself and others
________
All Corona measures are based on the Infection Protection Act (IfSG).
In §1, the IfSG demands the scientific nature of all those involved, including those of the virologists who claim the existence of the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2.
The virologists are clearly anti-scientific and have refuted themselves, which is why the IfSG is not fulfilled, but violated and therefore the legal basis for all corona measures is withdrawn.
In all seven steps that virologists take to claim a virus, they refuse to comply with the most important scientific duty, the verification of their methods: They never document control experiments! For this reason alone, statements by virologists claiming that viruses cause illness should never be considered scientific.
If you read the short methods and materials section of the supposedly scientific publications of the virologists, you will see that the virologists have refuted themselves with their explanations of the seven steps.
The ruling in the measles virus trial from 2012 to 2017 contains a meaning that goes beyond the measles compulsory vaccination: This jurisprudence removes the basis of the entire virology.
This is exciting news for humanity! The end of virology & vaccines is coming soon!
The complete fraudulent virology will soon be unmasked on the example of the computer conversion of parts of the alleged HIV into alleged Sars-cov-2. The end of the scam!
An example of creating the genome of the alleged sars-cov-2 from the sequences of the alleged HIV will destroy the complete fraudulent virology. SOON!
The point is that parts of alleged HIV cannot be parts of alleged Coronavirus at the same time. But that is exactly the case!
You all know that virologists do not isolate an alleged “viral” particle because it does not exist. Here's another piece of evidence: Virologists are rapidly moving to bizarre collections of genetic material after a procedure of mixing or contamination with animal RNA. The total RNA is extracted not from the alleged viral particle, which would be logical, but from BALF or CC - supernatant. Now let's look at what the scientific publication that is the basis of the corona scandal says:
"Bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid samples were collected in sterile cups to which virus transport medium was added."
"VIRAL GENOME SEQUENCING
RNA extracted from bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid and culture supernatants was used as a template to clone and sequence the genome."
Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS) is one of the sources of genetic contamination in studies that fraudulently allege to have "isolated SARS-COV-2". 4/2/21
Fetal Bovine Serum RNA Interferes with the Cell Culture derived Extracellular RNA
And see the ingredients in the CDC's SOP#: DSR-052-05 for "viral transport medium", which patient samples are often stored in before even getting to a lab for a useless PCR test, or fraudulent "isolation" procedures.
Here is the measles control experiment that has been robot translated. Important to note that this is written by the head of one of the 2 independent laboratories that made the experiments. 4/2/21
The experiments of Enders on the Track
____________________________
The final rebuttal of virology. English version. 6/3/21
THE REST OF THIS AMAZING ARTICLE / COMPLATION HERE
STEFFAN LANKAS CONTROL EXPERIMENTS AND VIRUS MYTH BREAKDOWN
SHOW US THE VIRUS PAGE ON COURT CASE AGAINST THE EXISTENCE OF SARSCOV2
THE FILES AND DOCUMENTS GOING INTO THE COURT CASE AGAINST THE EXISTENCE OF SARSCOV2 ------> https://www.showusthevirus.info/about-3
DR. Saeed Qureshi -
tom video break down
__________________
“If I could live my life over again, I’d devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat, disease tissue, rather than being the cause of disease tissue.” -Dr. Rudolph Virchow, renowned scientist, considered the ‘Father of Pathology’
_______________________
All Mike Stone Coronavirus papers
Mike Stone document links
LACK OF "SARS-COV-2" ANIMAL MODEL:
________
Let's look at all the ways that they say you CAN NOT get "SARS-COV-2:"
"New evidence has emerged from China indicating that the LARGE MAJORITY OF CORONAVIRUS INFECTIONS DO NOT RESULT IN SYMPTOMS
"CORONAVIRUS" DISCOVERY Papers:
SARS-COV-1 PAPER:
ZAKI 2012 MERS CORONAVIRUS PAPER:
"SARS-COV-2" variants and mutations
PARK 2020 "SARS-COV-2" PAPER:
ZHOU 2020 "SARS-COV-2" PAPER:
ZHU 2020 "SARS-COV-2" PAPER:
D.A TYRRELL 1965 "CORONAVIRUS" DISCOVERY:
CDC 2020 "SARS-COV-2" PAPER:
__________
FOUCHIER 2003 SARS-COV-1 KOCH'S POSTULATES FULFILLED(?):
In order to prove a new pathogenic "virus" exists, Koch's Postulates must be satisfied first.
There is NO PROOF of a purified/isolated "Coronavirus" that fulfills Koch's Postulates:
DROSTEN 2020 "SARS-COV-2" PCR PAPER:
__________
The Case against Rapid Mass Testing for "Coronavirus:"
PCR Ct Value standard
Scathing review of the Drosten PCR test:
Christian Drosten's history with fraud:
Flu cases are being relabeled as "COVlD-19,"
_____________
Two undeniable facts about "SARS-COV-2" (and any other "virus" for that matter):
______________________
THE HUMAN VIROME:
A huge problem for Virologists
MISINTERPRETING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE IMAGES:
The vaccines have 95% efficacy...or 19%?
"A Comparison of Plasmid DNA and mRNA as Vaccine Technologies" in April 2019:
Guidance An authorisation by the Chief Health Office under the s. 197 and s.198 Public Health Act 2016 (WA) to authorise relevant Australian Defence Force employees to supply and administer the COVID-19 Vaccine.
Beware those who would sell you on the disease and the "cure."
____CASE AGAINST VIROLOGY___
Is complete purification/isolation of a "virus" even possible?
Purification of a "virus" is impossible
THE CASE AGAINST CELL CULTURES:
Cell line misidentification is a huge problem in cell cultures.
"Cell culture RELIES ON THE ASSUMPTION that the behavior of cells in vitro is fundamentally similar to their behavior as part of a tissue within an organ of a multicellular organism."
Cell Cultures:
SUB-CULTURING and CELL CULTURE ADAPTATIONS:
The Human Genome Is FULL OF VIRUSES
The Slippery Slope of Reference Genomics
VIRAL TRANSPORT MEDIA:
The Case against Rapid Mass Testing for "Coronavirus:"
PCR Ct Value standard
________________________
Mike Stones' FB page about viruses and antibodies
_________________
ANTIBODY THEORY
_____________
PAUL EHRLICH'S 1900 SIDE-CHAIN THEORY (PART 1):
PAUL EHRLICH'S 1900 SIDE-CHAIN THEORY PART 2: THE COMPLEMENT SYSTEM
RANK MACFARLANE BURNET 1957 CLONAL SELECTION THEORY:
MICHAEL HEIDELBERGER 1929 ANTIBODY EQUATION:
LINUS PAULING'S 1940 ANTIBODY STRUCTURE THEORY:
ASTRID FAGRAEUS 1948 PLASMA CELLS PRODUCE ANTIBODIES CORRELATION:
CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF ANTIBODIES:
FIRST ATOMIC RESOLUTION STRUCTURE OF AN ANTIBODY FRAGMENT(?) 1973:
KÖHLER AND MILSTEIN'S 1975 MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES:
ANTIBODY IMAGES
2011 TEM IMAGES OF ANTIBODIES(?):
MERRILL CHASE INADVERTENTLY DISPROVES ANTIBODIES IN 1942:
DO ANTIBODIES EQUAL PROTECTION? THEY DON'T KNOW:
REPRODUCIBILITY CRISIS IN ANTIBODY RESEARCH:
ANTIBODIES ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR IMMUNITY:
ACP's NEW "COVID-19" ANTIBODY GUIDELINES:
ANTIBODY MADNESS! MISSING ANTIBODY, MISSING PROTECTION?:
ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY?:
__________
ONE OF MANY FOI
___________
MY OWN WITH HELP INVESTIGATION INTO CLAIMS OF A PURIFIED ISOLATED SARSCOV2 "VIRUS"
(A BOUT WITH YOUTUBER CALIMING TO DEBUNK THE VIROLOGY DEBUNKERS)
There seems to be a number of loose ends from this paper.1. They state that their specimen was "SARS-CoV-2 (isolate MUC-1, kind gift of G. Dobler..." - where did G. Dobler get the sample from and how had it been prepared to this stage? i.e. how do we know it's a virus per se. 2. They describe a virus "purification" process with "infected" Vero cells but don't seem to show any evidence at the end of the process that they had achieved purification e.g. comparison of electron micrographs. 3. After their "purification" they report they had a "...limited amount of available RNA" - that's not promising! Then they start their sequencing... Perhaps all we can say is that the authors performed some very technical experiments on particles that were not purified and not shown to be a virus. To be fair to these authors it doesn't look like they were claiming to have isolated and purified SARS-CoV-2 even through the word purify appeared in the paper.
(FROM THE MATERIALS SECTION OF THAT PAPER)
"Materials and Methods
SARS-CoV-2 propagation
SARS-CoV-2 (isolate MUC-1, kind gift of G. Dobler, Bundeswehr Institute for
Microbiology) was used for cell infections. It was propagated on Vero E6 cells (ATCC®
CRL-1586) with an adsorption of 1 h at 37°C and shaking every 10-15 min. "
https://science.sciencemag.org/.../abd5223_Turonova_SM.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7665311/
They state they were gifted an "isolate" which does not say where it came from or what was done to it. The fact that they cultured the "virus" in Vero cells tells you everything you need to know as to whether it is purified or not. Basically the same old cell culture junk with limited information on the actual specimen:
"SARS-CoV-2 (isolate MUC-1, kind gift of G. Dobler, Bundeswehr Institute for Microbiology) was used for cell infections. It was propagated on Vero E6 cells....
... (ATCC® CRL-1586) with an adsorption of 1 h at 37°C and shaking every 10-15 min. Infected cells were controlled for cytopathic effect every 24h and culture supernatant was usually
collected 48h-72h post infection,"
On top of that, they can not claim "SARS-COV-2" was finally purified/isolated in Oct. 2020. It would have had to have been purified/isolated at the time of the original publications in January 2020 when they supposedly got the sequence and EM images. You can't state it wasn't done back then but was in Oct. That is ridiculous.
Even if this paper was proof of a purified/isolated "SARS-COV-2" (it isn't) they would still need to prove it pathogenic which to date has yet to be done as no suitable animal model which accurately recreates the human disease exists at all.
__________
If a "virus" exists, it should be able to be taken and purified/isolated directly from the sick patient. If they can't do that, how did they ever determine "viruses" existed and needed to be cultured in the first place? They create particles through cell culturing and claim them as "viruses" because these particles can not be found when taken from sick humans.
What evidence shows "viruses" must be cultured? If they state there is too little "virus" in the sample from a sick patient, where was this determined? They would still need purified/isolated particles directly from a sick patient first in order to determine there is not enough and that cell culturing is the best way to produce more. However, they never did that.
________________________
“The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by “consensus,” sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary “unicorn,” so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.”
#2 COVID Admission: CDC Scientists Found That SARS-CoV-2 Didn’t Infect Human Tissue
A big part of the official story we were told was that COVID was a new, dangerous and unpredictable disease that was both fast-spreading and lethal. Well, it’s apparently not very lethal since the CDC scientists found that it couldn’t even infect human cells in vitro.
Now from here WE should segway into what can PCR actually detect ....
From a fellow investigator;
PCR is testing ACE2/TMPRSS2 expression, which is caused by Radiation. Yes, it's meaningless for "virus" infection, but if you think about "Radiation Injury" it's not that meaningless.
HALF OF MY BLOGS ARE COLLECTION FROM OTHERS FINDINGS
