The Controls
All seven steps that virologists take to claim a virus, they refuse to adhere to the most important scientific duty, the verification of...
top of page
BLOG
the 411
ABOUT ME - WHOS ASKING?
Before the "Crisis" or Financial Coup, Attack on Human Rights and Pinnacle of corruption and scientific Fraud, I was already spending a good amount of my free time researching facts. Problem is we don't think we can find them. Even if you magically find your self on PUBMED, it takes understand that isn't the end all. Majority of it is fluff and 80-90% is paid for by big pharma. All roads lead to Terrain, would be a goo book title because that is the light at the end of the tunnel found after countless hours of finding the fallacy and gaps and dangers of the tunnel vison of Germ Theory and Virus theory. The Terrain Model of understand Disease is the The light side of the moon and explains all the fallacies of our current allopathic germophobic paradigm of understanding disease. Terrain model was fathered by Antoine Bechamp and the Contemporary of Louis Pasture, whom had his work stolen Bechamps work and was almost written out of history although I would argue should be the championed. Not Pasture. Many continued Bechamp's work whether knowingly or on their own scientific discovery.
Read a brief of those pioneers here;
https://www.theart-oflife.com/blog/antoinebechamp#/
I ended up taking a admittedly almost obsessive deep dive into the protocols and so-called science that was being used to excuse these extreme measures, that are not warranted, not even in the allopathic paradigm.
It should seem evident all the physical, financial, psychological damage was done on false precepts.
.
As it comes to the current state of science at least no evidence has come forth that have been able to fulfill Koch postulates including proof of pathogenicity. Which should not and can not ever be excluded as steps in "virus" hunting or identification. Its has grown to many peoples attention that the reason for skipping steps or changing definitions steps is the inability to. Upon review of the logical scientific methods for identifying "viral" pathogens and even more so proof outside of these steps, you should conclude that the claimed "scientific" discovery of not only sars-cov2, but all alleged pathogens" is questionable guesswork, if not fraud.
If the hypothesis is not backed up its remains a theory. However not many are so lucrative. So you work around the science with your billions of dollars. No one knows the better.
It would be understated if i called this fraud alone. Clearly there are some stings attached of the carrot that is leading many faculties of ourselves, families, communities, cities. states, country, privacy, freedom, human rights, right not to be experimented on etc.
I beleive there is also fair warning that vaccine passports or their benefactors have ulterior motive. Ww really should be protesting vaxx passports with the rest of the world, for multiple multiple reasons.
A. The evidence i have here in "Lab Rat Island" should be enough to confirm that those injections are not fit for use on humans.
B. ITS MEDICAL APARTHIDE AND THERE IS NO MEDICAL OR PUBLIC HEALTH JUSTIFICATION. In any paradigm. Many virologists, pharmaceutical management, doctors are all giving warnings about the continuation of the use of these ill constructed dangerous drugs called a cv19 jab.
Most of the people I talk to are not going for it for one or another reason. The pcr test used to diagnosis alleged new pathogen has been called in to question, motivating papers to retract the test, stop the lockdowns, now to stop the injections. I take it a bit further than that in this blog site. For now lets start with a little good old fashion hey what are you putting in your arm? article which has information that could have saved 10's of thousands of lives had I tried harder to get the message out.
(READ BLOG LAB RAT ISLAND ON MRNA immunotherapies being called "vaccines" HERE;
“If I could live my life over again, I’d devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat, disease tissue, rather than being the cause of disease tissue.” -Dr. Rudolph Virchow, renowned scientist, considered the ‘Father of Pathology’
You could think of it like this; Mosquitoes seek the stagnant water, but don’t cause the pool to become stagnant. Its the same way with germs.
“Germs seek their natural habitat – diseased tissue – rather than being the cause of diseased tissue.” -Antoine Béchamp
“if we see flies on a manure pile which do we think is more intelligent – to fight disease be swatting flies or to remove the pile of manure.” -Dr. J. Baldor, Surgeon, Florida
send me a message
ART-ICLE AAYY ON FACEBOOK
This information can change the lanscape of our childrens future for the better. It is good news and not entirely quick to digest.
"....disease investigations are greatly biased against toxicology; witness the usual omission and avoidance of toxicology. Virology stands on relatively weak ground, having created its own standards of proof for causation that would never hold in any other science. Money influences the theater of medical science and viruses have few dollars to spend on lawyers and laboratories, whereas chemical poisons are defended by the world's largest corporations. Mere association seems sufficient to identify and declare a virus 2 the culprit."
- bmj.com / ddt-and-polio
I believe we are looking at an opportunity to review some of the "science", that has changed the world in
Refutation of SARS COV-2 (chronological order/ clerks version)
https://docdro.id/u14B6Cx
Refutation of Sars Cov-2 (just the necessary/ index)
https://docdro.id/BQf8xnQ
240 pages on ANTIBODY THEORY FALLACY
UPDATED 9-8-21
https://docdro.id/K8UAWmI
758 pages on VIRUS THEORY FALLACY (A Refutation of Virology) - takes a second to load -
updated 9/7/21
The Boiling Frog - The New Pollution
Environmental changes are rarley studied. If I virus theory remains a theory, it would prove urgent to draw focus towards any other expanation for said phenomenon.
https://nateserg808.wixsite.com/my-site/post/gastrotheca-boiling-frog-2
Note; hundreds of doctors, scientist, virologist, immunologist, pharma employees; have all called for the halt of the jab rollout, including Moderna's Dr. Robbert Molone, Pfizers Micheal Yedon.
Urgent letter and information on the "Vaccine" HERE:
https://nateserg808.wixsite.com/my-site/post/how-to-wear-monochromatic
It appears evident mainstream media blast misleading headlines that are not able to be backed up by the "evidence:"
HEADLINE: Nearly all COVID deaths in US are now among unvaccinated
Yet these two statements were included in the actual article:
"The AP ANALYZED FIGURES provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The CDC itself HAS NOT ESTIMATED what percentage of hospitalizations and deaths are in fully vaccinated people, CITING LIMITATIONS IN THE DATA.
Among them: ONLY ABOUT 45 STATES REPORT BREAKTHROUGH INFECTIONS, and some are MORE AGGRESSIVE THAN OTHERS in looking for such cases. SO THE DATA PROBABLY UNDERSTATES SUCH INFECTIONS, CDC officials said."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/nearly-covid-deaths-us-now-154100375.html
So the Associated Press decided to crunch the numbers of limited, admittedly inaccurate data to create headlines to advertise for a rushed, experimental "vaccination" campaign that has so far had over 13,627 Post-COVID Vaccine Reported Deaths / 22,501 Total VAERS Reported Deaths. 55,821 Post-COVID Vaccine Reported Hospitalizations/133,592 Total VAERS Reported Hospitalizations. 623,341 COVID Vaccine Adverse Event Reports (also underreported/undercounted) and the addition of warning labels for blood clots and heart inflammation.
And the CDC admitted to not tracking all vaccination breakthrough cases May 1st, 2021 and also cited inaccurate data back then:
"THE NUMBER OF COVID-19 VACCINE BREAKTHROUGH INFECTIONS REPORTED TO CDC LIKELY ARE AN UNDERCOUNT OF ALL SARS-CoV-2 INFECTIONS AMONG FULLY VACCINATED PERSONS. National surveillance RELIES ON PASSIVE AND VOLUNTARY REPORTING, AND DATA MIGHT NOT BE COMPLETE OR REPRESENTATIVE. These surveillance data are a snapshot and help identify patterns and look for signals among vaccine breakthrough cases."
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/covid-19/health-departments/breakthrough-cases.html
Why anyone has any trust left in the MSM and the CDC at this point is beyond me.
Their See through. The information is there when you read past the headlines.
CONCERNING THE CLAIM UNVAXXED ARE FILLING HOSPITALS
1- It would seem their numbers are manipulted, by counting anyone that's not 14 days post final shot (2nd regimen for Pfizer/Moderna and Single for J&J) as "unvaccinated".
This means you could have had your second Moderna shot 13 days and 23 hours ago but if you're admitted with "Covid like symptoms" (which I'm sure we can all agree could be caused by injecting yourself with ...) then you count as "unvaccinated" and go into their stats as such.
See the problem here?
"....and unvaccinated <14 days receipt of the first dose of a 2-dose series or 1 dose of the single-dose vaccine or if no vaccination registry data were available..."
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7034e5.htm?s_cid=mm7034e5_w
SO YES. These hospitalizations will be considered unvaxxinated.
The average person would define "unvaccinated" as having had Zero shots ever.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated.html
Observed the 14-day trick in the trials, used it to downsize jab reactions by calling it latent covid.
2. Hospitals are not required to report to the CDC hospitalization of vaccinated persons.
"DSHS doesn’t track the number of COVID-19 hospitalizations among vaccinated people statewide because hospitals are not required to report that information"
BUT SOMEHOW they can say "all new COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations in the area have been among unvaccinated people." - ...
https://www.texastribune.org/2021/07/21/coronavirus-texas-vaccinated-deaths/
BY calling people that have been injected with just one or 2 does unvaccinated or even partially vaccinated, for any reason, takes the blame off the drug of any onset illness or hospitalization. (Partialy: after shot or shots but not considered vaccinated due to when they think it should be working, which would be the three months wayneing of the "immunty" supposedly offered by the jabs, so still not counted as a vaccine injury etc.)
DEMOGRAPHICS ARE NOT CONSIDERED:
If a particular town or city has low vaccination rates, the hospitals are likely to represent that common feature. There will be more of any demographic that represents an inequality in an areas demographics.
CONCERNING "CASE" #'S
1. The CDC stopped recording "breakthrough" "infections" months ago.
Top epidemiologist: CDC undercounting vaccinated COVID cases
https://www.wnd.com/2021/07/top-epidemiologist-cdc-undercounting-vaccinated-covid-cases/?fbclid=IwAR0Lwa0ra-5a8goArx9oZC4wrHjapnfUimU9iflmNtCcoGsS0ozOeRhEqAs
2. "Vaccinated" people are not tested as often.
_____
All this confusion in the US while it seems to be very evident in other places for example Israel and Ireland:
Less than a third of delta variant deaths are in the unvaccinated.
Let me say that another way – two-thirds of Delta deaths in the UK are in the jabbed.
From the 1st of February to the 2nd of August, the UK recorded 742 Delta deaths (yes, the dreaded Delta has not taken that much life).
Out of the 742 deaths, 402 were fully vaccinated. 79 had received one shot. Only 253 were unvaccinated.
____
The new Covid vaccines will make billions of dollars for the big pharmaceutical companies, but here’s what they won’t do:
-The vaccines will not cure Covid
-The vaccines will not prevent people from contracting Covid
-The vaccines will not prevent Covid-related hospitalizations
-The vaccines will not prevent Covid-caused deaths
Now, I know what you’re thinking. You’re thinking, “If the vaccine does not protect me from getting Covid (or dying from Covid), then why should I take it?”
And the answer is: “You shouldn’t. It makes no sense at all, especially in view of the fact that new vaccines pose considerable risks to one’s health and well-being.
In early April 2021 the CDC director admitted the covid experimental biological agents "vaccine" does not make on less contagious.
____
The incidences of immediate side effects in both trials were significant and dwarfed the absolute risk reduction in both the primary efficacy endpoints, as well as for “severe” Covid.
For example, for Moderna 81.9% experienced any systemic reaction. Grade 3 reactions (considered severe) were experienced by 17.4%. This is 79X more likely than the incidence of severe Covid in the Moderna group. (17.4/.22=79X) Based on preliminary reports of adverse events [emphasis added]:
This is an injury rate of 1 in every 40 jabs. This means that the 150 shots necessary to avert one mild case of COVID will cause serious injury to at least three people.“
For the rest of the info on the jabs ---> Sought information on the mRNA injections / and the rest of this article here;
https://nateserg808.wixsite.com/my-site/post/how-to-wear-monochromatic
SHOP MY LOOK
bottom of page