No small matter

jim o kelly

A MEDICAL FALLACY BASED ON EDWARD JENNER’S VACCINATION METHOD

THE CAUSE OF SMALLPOX, MISUNDERSTOOD

The scientific definition of the word virus in the 1800s was, from the Latin, poison.

The medical definition was “A poisonous substance produced in the body as a result of some disease.

Current definition. An infectious organism that is submicroscopic and can only multiply only inside living cells, is now understood to be a non-cellular structure lacking life of its own and made up of DNA or RNA core inside a protein coat. Formerly called “filterable viruses.”

The fallacy of the cause of smallpox and the deception of the living virus exposed for the first time.

The word virus used in the scientific world when small-pox existed, before it was changed was referring to a poison of any kind. When the phrase “virus of small-pox was used they meant small-pox poison. So let’s take a closer look at the condition called small-pox. A person would develop sores all over their body. These sores would sometimes eliminate pus. The pus was the result of the disease called small-pox. That is the body was trying to eliminate the pus from itself.

The mistake made by Edward Jenner and physicians of that time was they believed that the pus being eliminated by the body was the cause of the disease. Common sense should have indicated that the pus was the result of the disease, like fever, sweating, pimples, and vomiting. So the virus was just the pus (poison) being eliminated in order for the body to restore health. Here is what it took me forever to figure out. The pus as stated was the result of the disease called small-pox. Now Jenner took the result (pus) of the disease and turned it into the cause of disease, by injecting it into a cow. The cow’s body in trying to protect itself from the injected pus made its own infection. So the result of smallpox became the cause of infection in the cow. In thinking backwards about cause and effect, Jenner now claims the infection (result) is now a prevention of the disease. So the bottom line is that the pus of small-pox becomes the result, cause, and prevention of the disease. I know it’s confusing, I had to spend some time understanding this way of thinking.

What Jenner did was to take the result (pus) of a natural disease and create artificial disease in the cow. So now we have two causes of disease. One is natural and the other is artificial. The cause of the natural small-pox of a person was not the pus, but something else like, (filth, malnutrition, etc.) The cause of the injected pus in a person or cow was artificially created disease.

So what Jenner did was to create artificial disease by injecting pus into a healthy arm. But was it really a disease or just a sore created by the body to eliminate the poison that was built in it? The problem becomes clearer when you see a picture of a vaccination and a picture of a person with smallpox. The vaccinated sore may resemble the natural sore at some point, but they are not the same. A picture of a person covered with small-pox looks like they have hard bumps all over them. The poison injected by Jenner sometimes would cause a eating of the flesh which did not occur with the natural disease. So let’s try to figure out why the body develops a sore when pus is injected into it. Common sense says that if poison is eaten, drank, or injected, the body is going to react to it. It may react with, fever, diarrhea, skin eruptions, or vomiting, or all of these. In some cases a person with a strong immune system, the poison will be eliminated or neutralized by the body without ill-effects. People with different strengths and weaknesses of immunity would be more or less susceptible and exhibit different symptoms from mild to severe or none at all.

You may be asking okay but what has the Jenner method of vaccinating 200 years ago have to do with today’s vaccinations? Surely today's vaccines are new and improved. My answer is they may have a few new poisons added to the virus, but the principle is still the same. Modern-day vaccines are said to be made,” with the virus that causes the disease.” Now that you know that the virus is actually the result of disease you can probably guess what the virus used in vaccines today is. For example, I don’t want to get too gross, but the virus (result) of the flu vaccine is the result of the flu. (Nasal discharge).

They still use the result (symptom) of a disease, claim it is the cause of disease, and then incredibly claim it is the prevention of disease. Modern medicine isn’t so modern. In fact, that’s why they have not cured anyone in 2000 years. They just treat symptoms, not the cause. See vaccine recipes for proof.

An example of cause an effect. A person with clear skin is put on a diet of fried foods, donuts, pop, and sweets of all kinds for 30 days. The person develops a severe case of pimples. The pimples develop pus. The pus dries and forms a crust, just like small-pox, and fall off. The body has just eliminated the pus (virus poison) the person changes his diet to fruits and vegetables. The pimples don’t come back. What was the cause of the pimples? Jenner believed it was the pus. That the pus was the cause of itself. You know the cause was the Frankenstein food they ate. What we don’t know are the conditions those people lived in. Those were the days of starvation, famine, and living in complete filth. Actually, that information is available in books about living conditions during that time period.

So let us reason. A town with say a population of 400 lives in a condition of filth. Food is scarce. Bathrooms do not exist and the air is filled with the smell of dunghills. Let's say 50 of those people get sick and die. I can understand why the doctors and people of that time thought it was caught. They were ignorant of the Laws of Nature, which were fresh air, sunshine, good fresh food, clean water, and exercise. But what I don’t understand is why the medical profession doesn’t get it now? Oh it couldn’t be the money, could it?

jim o kelly

Now that we know about the true cause of illness, it gives a much clearer picture of Jenner's experiments.

Your questions at the end are ones that I've recently started to ask. If someone like me, who has done limited reading on the subject of the cause of illness was able to find the truth, how does one go through years of medical school without questioning the false data they're being given?

I know that throughout history superstition has led to poor solutions to problems of health. But in this day and age, how can the medical community not conduct some simple experiments to prove our disprove both the germ theory and the terrain theory? It would require a very minute effort to do so, wouldn't it?

So I conclude that there is either gross incompetence, or gross corruption in the medical world. Or both.

· Reply · Share · 24w

Jim O'Kelly

Probably both (gross incompetence and corruption.) But keep in mind when you were in high school the teacher taught you learned. You didn't question and neither did the medical kids. Memorize and repeat. Now having said that if a person has been in the medical field for 20 years they should have realized that it didn't work, and now in today's world there is no excuse for anyone in the field to be ignorant. I think but do not know that most of them know. But they are not going to give up their jobs unless damage or death has happened to them. There were many doctors and people I call Healthologist that tried to tell the truth in the 1900s but were suppressed. And the drug companies became a force that no one can beat.

__________________

On SMALLPOX from "The Poisoned Needle" By Eleanor McBean:

From its inception down to the present time vaccination has been denounced as dangerous, disease producing and even deadly, by all thinking doctors who have investigated the facts and have had the courage to voice them.

A few of these published statements from prominent doctors are presented here:

From Dr. Alexander Wilder, Editor of the New Yolk Medical Times, Professor of Pathology in the United States Medical College of New York and author of WILDER'S HISTORY OF MEDICINE, we have this observation:

"Vaccination is the infusion of contaminating element into the system, and after such contamination you can never be sure of regaining the former purity of the body. Consumption follows in the wake of vaccination as certainly as effect follows cause."

Dr. Walter M. James of Philadelphia says:

"Vaccination does not stay the spread of smallpox nor even modify it in those who get it after vaccination. It does introduce into the system, and therefore contributes to the spread of, tuberculosis, cancer and even leprosy. It tends to make more virulent epidemics of smallpox and to make them more extensive. It does just what inoculation did - cause the spread of disease."

Dr. Kalb, Royal Examiner of Statistics for Bavaria, states:

"Examination shows vaccination a complete failure. In this single year, 3,994 vaccinated people died of smallpox; the total number attacked exceeded 29,000." (All were vaccinated.)

Dr. L Hall Bakewell, Vaccinator General of Trinidad said:

"I have very little faith in Vaccination even as modifying the disease, and none at all as a protective in virulent epidemics. Personally, I contracted smallpox less than six months after a most severe re-vaccination."

This doctor was in the vaccination business; his livelihood depended on it and he wanted to believe in it. In Trinidad where vaccination was compulsory he had ample opportunity to observe the full effects of it on a large scale, yet he voluntarily denounced the practice as a failure.

Dr. L C. Carter of London reports:

"In looking over the history of vaccination for smallpox, I am amazed to learn of the terrible deaths from vaccination, amputations of arms and leg., foot and mouth disease, tetanus (1ockjaw), septicemia (bood poisoning), cerebro-spinal meningitis."

Dr. J. C. Ward M.R.C.S. at Harrogate, (England) among many others confesses to a change of heart on the vaccination question in this statement:

"I believed that vaccination prevented smallpox. I believed that if it did not absolutely prevent it in every case, it modified the disease in some cases, and I believed that re-vaccination, if only frequent enough, gave absolute immunity. Experience has driven all that out of my head; I have seen vaccinated persons get smallpox, and persons who had been vaccinated get smallpox, and I have seen those who had had smallpox get it a second time and die of it."

Professor Adolf Vogt, who held the chair of vital Statistics and Hygiene in Berne University for 17 years said:

"After collecting the particulars of 400,000 cases of small pox I am compelled to admit that my belief in vaccination is absolutely destroyed."

Dr. Charles E. Page of Boston said:

"I have been a regular practitioner of medicine in Boston for 33 years. I have studied the question of vaccination conscientiously for 45 years. As for vaccination as a preventative of disease, there is not a scrap of evidence in its favor. Injection of virus into the pure bloodstream of the people does not prevent Smallpox. Rather, it tends to increase its epidemics and makes the disease more deadly. Of this we have indisputable proof. In our country (U.S.) cancer mortality has increased from 9 per 100,000 to 80 per 100,000 or fully 900 per cent increase, within the past years, and no conceivable thing could have caused this but the universal blood poisoning now existing."

Dr. Forbes Laurie says:

"I can add my testimony to the others . . . that vaccination contributes to the great increase in cancer.

GOVERNOR HAS SUSPICIONS

Hon. Percival P. Baxter, Governor of Maine (1924) stated:

"Personally I have grave doubts as to the efficacy of modern serums and vaccines and am convinced that commercialism has exercised a considerable influence upon some phases of modem medicine."

Dr. William Howard Hay of Buffalo, New York said:

"We have no proof of the boasted effectiveness of any form of anti-toxin, vaccine or serum. The true figures on vaccination for smallpox have never gotten before the public, though they can be seen in the files of the various departments of the Army as well as the government, if one cares to look for them. If the record of vaccination in the Philippines alone were ever to become a matter of general knowledge it would finish vaccination in the whole country, at least among those who are able to read and think for themselves. After three years of the most rigid vaccination, when every Philippino had been vaccinated from one to six times, there occurred the severest epidemic of smallpox that the Islands had ever seen, with a death-rate running in places to over 70 per cent, and in all, well over 60,000 deaths. Is it any wonder the public is getting a little suspicious of us and our vaunted 'medical discoveries?' The wonder to me is that there are still millions of them willing to submit to vaccination and serum treatment."

Alfred Russell Wallace D.D. who spent many years doing research all over the world, collecting data on both sides of the vaccination question had this to say:

"While utterly powerless for good, vaccination is a certain cause of disease and death in many cases and is the probable cause of about 10,000 deaths annually in England, by five diseases of the most terrible and disgusting character."

L F. Cornell, M.D., President of the Homeopathic Medical Society of New York said: (1868)

It is my firm conviction that vaccination has been a curse instead of a blessing to the race. Every physician knows that cutaneous (pertaining to the skin) diseases have increased in frequency, severity, and variety to an alarming extent. To what is this increase owing? Contagion may account for some of the varieties; in a large majority, however, to no medium of transmission is the wide spread dissemination of this class of diseases so largely indebted as to vaccination."

Dr. E. M. Ripley, of Unionville, Connecticut, stated in a public address delivered in New Britain, Connecticut:

"Never in the history of medicine has there been produced so false a theory, such fraudulent assumptions, such disastrous and damning results as have followed the practice of vaccination; it is the ultima thule (extremity) of learned quackery, and lacks, and has ever lacked, the faintest shadow of a scientific basis. The fears of the people have been played upon as to the dangers of smallpox and the sure prevention by vaccination, until nearly the whole civilized world has become physically corrupted by its practice.

"The life-blood of nations has become the cesspool of vaccinators wherein they have poured the foul excretions that are thrown off from diseased beasts, nature adjudging it too vile to contaminate the system of any living creature.

SCROFULA, that hydra-headed monster of pathology, whose ramifications extend into and complicate nearly all the diseases that flesh is heir to, and whose victims are as the sands of the seashore in number, is one of the oldest children of vaccine poisoning.

"SYPHILIS, that disreputable disorder, that sinks its victims below the scale of decency, and hounds them to dishonorable graves, has been carried by the vaccinator's needle into the homes of the innocent and virtuous, and there, with consequent suffering that defies the imagination of man to depict."

Dr. J. Peebles (M.D.,Ph.D.) in his hook "VACCINATION A MENACE TO PERSONAL LIBERTY" wrote:

"When a mad dog enters a community and bites a child, the whole population rises up and demands the death of the creature, and desires that all available means be immediately used to eliminate from the system of the child the virus that has been so cruelly inserted. The action of the people in this case is a very natural one; but let me tell you that where tile bite of a mad dog has caused death in one case, the mad doctor with his calf-lymph and poisoned needle has caused tens of thousands of deaths.

"Vaccination is the most outrageous insult that can be offered to any pure-minded man or woman. It is the boldest and most impious attempt to mar the works of God that has been attempted for ages. The stupid blunder of doctor-craft has wrought all the evil that it ought, and it is time that free American citizens arise in their might and blot out the whole blood-poisoning business."

Dr. Thomas Morgan, in his "MEDICAL DELUSIONS" (page 6) writes:

"At the present time, the medical profession prescribes innumerable poisons, such as arsenic, strychnine, morphine, mercury and other destructive drugs that ruin the health of the human race . . . and the greatest of all delusions is the GERM THEORY, and the consequent introduction of serum therapy, with its various antitoxins

"Notwithstanding the fact that these medical delusions have been the cause of more injury and death than pestilence, famine and war combined, the medical doctors have agreed to meet each other half way, on the common ground of self-interest, for the purpose of formulating and enforcing the tyrannical laws to prevent anyone outside their ring from practicing medicine."

The following public confession was made by J. W. HODGE M. D. of Niagara Falls, New York:

"To affirm that there never has been any scientific warranty for a belief in the alleged protective virtues of vaccination and that its practice is backed by ignorance and indifference, is a sorry charge to make against the medical profession...but the charge, I regret to say is only too true. I know whereof I affirm, for I, too, must plead guilty of the charge. Before discovering my mistake I had vaccinated more than 3,000 victims, ignorantly supposing the disease I was propagating to be a preventative of smallpox. Having taken for granted what my teachers had asserted, I was a staunch believer in the alleged efficacy of vaccination as a prophylactic against smallpox. I remained in this blind and blissful state of ignorance for several years, and not until I acquired a little experience in the school of observation and reflection did I discover that my faith was pinned to a shameful fraud.

"The first real eye-opener I received upon the subject was while I was practicing my profession in Lockport. At that time (1902) smallpox made its appearance in this city and soon attained the proportions of an epidemic. At the outbreak of the disease more vaccinations were ordered by the Department of Health and I was officially appointed Public Vaccinator. My duty was to go from house to house and vaccinate all persons who could not present recent vaccination scars on their bodies, and to re-vaccinate all those who could not give assurance of having been vaccinated within a period of two years.

"Just before and during the prevalence of this epidemic I vaccinated nearly 3,000 victims, using the so-called "pure calf-lymph" obtained every third day 'fresh' from the vaccine farm of the New York City Board of Health. Much to the disgust of the people, and more my own surprise and chagrin, I was confronted with a large number of cases of vaccinal erysipelas, as well as several cases of phlegmonous axillary abscesses following as results of vaccination. This is not all; a number of those vaccinated were attacked with confluent smallpox at periods varying from twelve days to three weeks, after having been rendered ‘immune' (?) by vaccination.

"These astounding facts, so contrary to my preconceived notions about vaccination and smallpox, I could not account for and they confused me as I was not able to see where the 'protection' came in.

"With Pascal, I 'considered the affirmation of facts more powerful than assertions of men'. I then began a careful study of the relations existing between smallpox and vaccination, with the ultimate result that I was forced to entirely abandon all faith in the medical dogma of vaccinal protection against smallpox. During the epidemic, I had under my inspection 28 smallpox patients, all of whom, with one exception, had been 'successfully' vaccinated. Several of these patients had been re-vaccinated before contracting the disease. THUS I WAS FORCED, THROUGH THE STERN LOGIC OF DISAGREEABLE FACTS, TO THE UNWELCOME CONCLUSION THAT VACCINATON HAD NOT PROTECTED THESE VICTIMS OF SMALLPOX.

"After the revelations of this dismal experience had dawned upon me I determined to make a careful study of the printed data on vaccination. After a thorough investigation of the statistics of smallpox epidemiology collected ffrom various parts of the world, I was treated to another great surprise, namely, the world's greatest statisticians on smallpox and vaccination fully corroorated the experience that I had met with in the Lockport epidemic.

"Previous to this disappointing experience I had read only the usual literature on the subject, found in libraries and medical schools. I had heard only the "expert" (one-sided) testimony of the pro-vaccinists. I knew but one side of the question and was like the one of whom John Stuart Mill spoke, when he mid:

'HE WHO KNOWS ONLY HIS OWN SIDE OF THE CASE KNOWS LITTLE OF THAT.'

"After a careful study of the history of vaccination and the extensive experience in its use, I am thoroughly convinced that:

"(1) Vaccination is utterly useless as a preventive against smallpox, that millions of vaccinated persons have died of smallpox.

"(2) The practice of this degrading rite is enforced by doctors as a dogma without being understood; that like other infamous dogma it is good only for "fees"

"(3) Inoculation as unanimously believed in and practiced by the "regular" doctors for 100 years was guilty of multiplying smallpox....

"( 4) Smallpox epidemics were checked by cessation of inoculation and not by the introduction of vaccination.

"(5) Smallpox continued to increase under vaccination until sanitation and improved nutrition came into more general use.

"(6) Health measures have controlled smallpox, and vaccination has claimed the credit.

"(7) Vaccination protects from smallpox only when it kills the patient before smallpox develops.

"(8) Vaccination has been the means of disseminating (spreading) consumption, cancer, syphilis, and many other fatal and loathsome diseases.

"(9) Tuberculosis is a disease common to cattle and to human beings and has frequently been conveyed by vaccination from the former to the latter, by way of vaccination.

"(10) Edward Jenner shaddled a legacy of disease and death on the human race and incidentally made $150,000 by the transaction.

"(11) Many doctors and some editors are making money by propagating this curse. (vaccination)

"(12) Vaccination is called 'successful' when it succeeds in making healthy people diseased.

"(13) Disease as the result of vaccination is the logical harvest from the seed sown.

"(14) Vaccination has no scientific basis upon which to rest its claims and no analogy in any ascertained principle or law in nature.

"(15) The so called 'spontaneous cow-pox' (from which vaccine is made) is a myth; the disease so named, being tubercular or syphilitic in its nature.

"(16) When vaccination kills its victims the facts are suppressed and the death certificates name other diseases as the cause.

"(17) Compulsory vaccination has been abolished in England, Switzerland, and certain other countries, while laws sustaining this crime still disgrace the statute books of many states in free (?) America.

"(18) Vaccination is one of the foulest blots on the escutcheon of the ‘nobel art of healing' ".

________________________

A PHYSICIANS MANUAL of VACCINE THERAPY

By G.H.SHERMAN, M.D.

1924

Page 159. PROFESSOR J. DANYSZ, Chief of Service, of the Pasteur Institute, Paris, in his book on " The Evolution of Disease" shows the value of mixed stock vaccines prepared from organisms isolated from the large intestinal content in the treatment of a large variety of diseases. The fact that he isolates the organisms from the intestinal content does not signify anything. A colon bacillus isolated from the feces would certainly not be a better organism to prepare a vaccine from than a colon bacillus which is isolated from an appendicular abscess or a colon bacillus peritonitis.

Pneumococci, streptococci and staphylococci which are responsible for infections of the upper respiratory tract are constantly being swallowed with saliva and food. There is no evidence that their passage through the digestive tract will improve them in their

Jim's comment. This is proof that they made vaccines out of the intestinal contents of a disease. Or the result of disease. Using the waste products of which there are bacteria and mixing it with human blood is the formula for making vaccines.

This was done by the false belief that bacteria or germs were the cause of disease. When in fact they were the result of disease. A doctor would look at a diseased organ (cut out of a cadaver) and see the germs and conclude they were the cause.

This false branch of science had a name. It was called Isopathy which means the product of disease will prevent or cure disease. Isopathy was coined in 1823 by Dr. Joseph lux. Dr. Lux coined this word as a tribute to Edward Jenner of smallpox fame. Edward Jenner died in 1823. I would call this a tribute from one quack to another.

And during that same period there was a man working on promoting the lie that virus was the cause of disease. Why? Because the scientific world was waking up to the false conclusion that germs was the cause of disease.

Jim Dandy O'Kelly Founder of the new Anti-Vaccination League of America and discoverer of the virus lie.

____________

Fundamentals of Nature Cure

By Herbert Shelton (1922) Page 36.

If the reader has given careful attention to the foregoing chapters he is prepared to understand that the only sure preventative of disease is to maintain health by healthful living and that the only road to health, if one is already sick, is through a reform in one's habits of living. He should be prepared to understand that recovery from disease and the reestablishment of health can come only by removing the cause of the trouble.

It has not been many years since rival medical schools waged a big war over what constitutes the true LAW OF CURE. Many fanciful theories were spun and much tongue lashing was indulged in as the various schools attempted to prove that they had the true law of cure. In discussing this phase of the subject Dr. Trall remarked:

"They are all wrong; there is no law of cure in all the Universe; Nature has provided nothing of the sort; Nature has provided penalties, not remedies. Think you, would Nature or providence provide penalties as the consequences of transgression, and then provide remedies to do away with the penalties? There is a condition of cure, and this is obedience."

Obedience to what? Obedience to the laws of our being. Obedience to these laws in our living, eating, sleeping, working, thinking, bathing, etc. And this is the only way it can be done. There are no substitutes for obedience, no substitutes for clean living. Nature insists that we behave ourselves or pay the price. There is no escape. Jim's comment. What is the price we pay? Disease and death.

__________________________

MEDICAL COUNCIL

A MONTHLY JOURNAL FOR THE PHYSICIAN AND SURGEON. PHILADELPHIA, PA. Nov. 1909.

20 cents Single Copy.

Suppression of Public Expectoration.

To the Medical Council.:

"Perhaps your readers will be interested to know what a number of physicians here in New York are doing for the purpose of further suppressing spitting in public conveyances and other places. We are organizing a " Voluntary Vigilance league," (LMAO) the duty of whose members it shall be to verbally call the attention of offenders to the dangers of such practice and to impress upon the laity, by the existence of such an organization, the penalty to which they are subject should they continue to ignore the warnings already displayed in most public places.

it requires some tact in approaching an offender, but in most instances, the co-worker has had no difficulty in proving to the person in question that the League was acting for the common good and that expectorating promiscuously is one of the most frequent methods of spreading tuberculosis."

Dr. J. Lebenstein.

224 East fiftieth Street, New York City.

Jim's comment: Most people still believe in the germ theory. This was 111 years ago and they call it "modern medicine. LMAO still.

_______________

Domeftic Medicine William Buchan (1789) Part 30

Chap. Page 284. OF THE HOOPING-COUGH

" This cough seldom affects adults, but proves often fatal to children. Such children as live upon thin watery diet, who breath unwholesome air, and have too little exercise, are most liable to this disease, and generally suffer most from it."

Jim's comment: Enough said, clearly this is a condition of children caused by poor diet, lack of exercise and polluted air.

___________

Leicester: Sanitation Versus Vaccination J.T.Biggs, J.P. (1912)

Member of the Leicester Town Council, and its Sanitary Committee, for over Twenty-Two Years.

Printed for and Published by THE NATIONAL ANTI-VACCINATION LEAGUE

27 Southampton Street, Strand London, W.C.

Page 72. Leicester has furnished, both by precept and example, irrefutable proof of the capability and influence of Sanitation, not only in combating and controlling, but also in practically banishing infectious diseases from its midst. Even for smallpox, not even the merest tyro among Jennerian votaries would now venture to claim that vaccination could achieve all that sanitation has accomplished.

Page 80. The experience of the terrible small-pox epidemic of 1871-73, when many thousands of vaccinated persons contracted the disease, and several hundreds died as the result of the alleged “protection.” Having lamentably failed in its hour of trial, produced in the minds of the thinking people of Leicester pronounced hostility against the blood-polluting quackery, which was found to be more harmful in its ultimate results than the disease it was supposed to prevent.

Page 94. If it be true that the small-pox strikes unvaccinated persons, how is it that the unvaccinated in Leicester have escaped, while the persons who have suffered were vaccinated?

Page 97. There is no small-pox in Leicester, and the few isolated cases during the past eleven years have been imported from so-called protected districts.

Page 117. Mr. William Young, secretary of the London Society, then moved-‘ That the principle of the Compulsory Vaccination Acts is subversive of that personal liberty which is the birthright of every free-born Briton; (American): that they are destructive of parental rights, tyrannical and unjust in operation, and ought therefore to be RESISTED by every constitutional means.’

Page 122. For many know as we do, that vaccination, as a defense against small-pox, is one of the grossest superstitions that ever afflicted the human mind.

Page 133. In 1872 they had a great deal of vaccination in Leicester and a great deal of small-pox; while in 1888-89 they had scarcely any vaccination and absolutely no small-pox.

Page 190. Small-pox is at the time of writing (1912) almost a thing of the past.”

___________

Elisha Test-For Determing Antibodies.

Step 1. Label the Titer Plate.

Step 2. Add Antigen to wells.

Step 3. Incubate.

Step 4. Remove Liquid from Well.

Step 5. Wash wells.

Step 6. Add Reagents. Any substance used to produce a chemical reaction.

Step 7. Incubate plate.

Step 8. Remove Liquid from Well.

Step 9. Wash Wells.

* Step 10. Add Antibodies.

Step 11. Incubate.

Step 12. Prepare Detection Substrate. A substance that splits compounds.

Step 13. Remove Antibody Solution.

Step 14. Add Substrate Solution-A Substance that splits compounds.

Step 15. Incubate.

* Step 16. Examine Results. It is a color test.

Postive if the color turns brown. What color if negative?

Antibody is from the blood of an animal. Animal is made sick artifically.

To determine antibodies Mix blood serum of recovered animal with infection and look for clumps. No antibodies exist-just clumps.

6 Comments

Peter John Ladetto

Makes sense.

Simple.

Poison stuff and mix it around.

Separate it add some toxified blood and make it turn colors.

Presto!

· Reply · Share · 16w

Ashley Fae

No photo description available.

· Reply · Share · 16w

Rhys Cutlan

'Elisha' test 🤣

· Reply · Share · 16w

Jim O'Kelly

Rhys Cutlan The explanation is bogus. That is an artist conception of what they think happens. No antibodies are seen in the real world. Just another way to keep the sheeple in line. The actual test is a color test.

___________

CANADA

MEDICAL & SURGICAL JOURNAL

FEBRUARY, 1886

Page 389. "Thus at this early period, when the dissection of human body was looked upon with horror and as an act of dissection, the enlightened and far-sighted Ptolemies, in spite of vulgar prejudices and religious scruples, enabled the School of Medicine of Alexandria to make a great stride forwards in learning, knowledge and reputation. It is said that Herophilus dissected 700 bodies and that both he and Erasistratus made a common practice of OPENING LIVING BODIES IN ORDER TO DISCOVER THE ORIGIN OF LIFE."

Jim's comment. In the early history they were looking for the source of life in the dead. Today they look at the result of disease (Pus-Inflammation-infection-Symptoms) for the cause of disease.

Who keeps calling this stupidity modern?

24 Comments

Sarah Hall

Wait, "vulgar predjudices and religious scruples" would have prevented the "far sited" (we're not worthy! 🛐) from opening up living people in the quest of knowledge? I'll stick to my idiotic vulgar predjudices and moral scruples, thanks.

· Reply · Share · 16w

Rhys Cutlan

So how would you find the solution to when someone is ill but you don't know what's making them ill?

· Reply · Share · 16w

Jim O'Kelly

Rhys Cutlan Not by looking at sick and dead people. That is the result of a dis-ease not a cause. I do know what is making them ill. Toxemia.

· Reply · Share · 16w

Lauren Whiteman

Admin

Rhys Cutlan Remove all of the unnatural habits and practices until you get results. Return the patient to the natural diet and eliminate all the unnatural foods they consume and Toxemia reverses course.

· Reply · Share · 16w

Rhys Cutlan

Lauren Whiteman Jim O'Kelly so if we use the process of elimination we can get healthy. Isnt that the scientific method though? The process of eliminating whats the cause of the toxemia is? If so wouldn't looking at the dead be a step of elimination if you live healthy and are still ill? If you have nothing else to try

· Reply · Share · 16w

Lauren Whiteman

Admin

Rhys Cutlan If you are truly living healthy then you would not be ill. The body only creates healing/cleaning symptoms (what allopathy calls disease) when the terrain is dirty. If you are eating your natural diet, after a period of cleaning out the d… See More

· Reply · Share · 16w

Jim O'Kelly

Rhys Cutlan I posted this because I have several hundred old medical books. It is a sample of the stupidity of the medical profession. Particulary the part in bold.

· Reply · Share · 16w

Rhys Cutlan

Lauren Whiteman so you could tell what there toxemoa was caused by looking at a dead body, wouldn't that be useful information for other people? I'm confused 😅

· Reply · Share · 16w

Jim O'Kelly

Rhys Cutlan They did not get the cause of the disease by loking at the result of disease. For example a doctor cuts out or uses chemo on a tumour. He is cutting out or shrinking the result of the cancer. He is not removing what caused the cancer. Or if you have arthritis you take drugs to treat the pain. But the cause is not removed. Or you have gall stones and you take out the gall bladder but the cause is still in the body and if your habits of living aren't changed the poison will show up somewhere else in the body. Think about it.

· Reply · Share · 16w

Rhys Cutlan

So if thats true and they cannot use the result of a disease to find a cause, then how do you explain why 'healthy' people just drop dead. Don't you think its worth trying to see why they died?

· Reply · Share · 16w

Jim O'Kelly

Rhys Cutlan I can't explain how healthy people just drop dead because healthy people don't drop dead. The problem is with your thinking or lack of it.

· Reply · Share · 16w

Rhys Cutlan

Jim O'Kelly or your want of understanding to fit your theory?

· Reply · Share · 15w

Rhys Cutlan

And I'm sure I'm thinking, why else would I be asking questions to try and expand my knowledge..?

· Reply · Share · 15w

Kerry Kiefer

Jim O'Kelly Healthy people can just drop dead. Death is part of the natural cycle here on earth, and the unwillingness to include death as a natural phenomenon also creates health problems.

· Reply · Share · 15w

Jim O'Kelly

Kerry Kiefer OMG How stupid can you be?

· Reply · Share · 15w

Kerry Kiefer

Jim O'Kelly Please be civil. If you cannot see that human beings are part of nature and that we run our course, as well, what are you doing posting here?

· Reply · Share · 15w

Kerry Kiefer

Terrain Model also refutes the medical establishment's form of atheism.

· Reply · Share · 15w

Kerry Kiefer

Jim O'Kelly Ask questions instead of name calling, unless you are just a 12 year old who must be reprimanded.

· Reply · Share · 15w

Jim O'Kelly

Kerry Kiefer Healthy people can just drop dead. If the truth hurst so be it.

· Reply · Share · 15w

Jim O'Kelly

hurts

· Reply · Share · 15w

Lauren Whiteman

Admin

Kerry Kiefer Rhys Cutlan Healthy people cannot Drop dead because by definition, dying before your natural expiration date is a sign of ill health. Someone can *appear healthy* based on the standards of a supremely sick society but that does not make them healthy. If someone dies before their 120th year (possibly 140-160 years would be more accurate) they have toxemia which has damaged the bodies ability to survive to the natural life span.

The marathon runner who drops dead at 35 was not healthy, they just exercised away the fat on their body. Their body was highly acidic because of wrong diet and abusing the body through excessive nerve energy depletion by way of extensive running. The "bodybuilder" who has big muscles and drops dead at 40 "but he was so healthy", no his body was highly toxic from years of excess protein consumption. His kidneys shut down years ago.

We have been so misled by the disease for profit industry and its various "big food" industry offshoots that we don't even know what healthy looks like any more. We think the person that lives till 90, a full 30 years less then their natural lifespan (maybe more) is the goal to strive for even though that 90 year old wasn't running jumping and playing like they are designed, they were walking with a cane or a walker barely able to hold their own weight.

We have been programmed through society to have certain perspectives on health which are false. So the first step in learning is unlearning all of these false paradigms and truly thinking deeply about what is natural versus what is common. What we see in society today is common. The average health, the blood work levels, the "healthy" person are all based on a profoundly sick society. They are not an accurate benchmark. They are not NORMAL, they are just COMMON.

· Reply · Share · 15w

Lauren Whiteman

Admin

Jim O'Kelly I know it is frustrating for all of us who have known this information for years and decades but try to remember that a lot of the younger generation has been raised on franken foods and have spent their entire lives being programmed to bel… See More

· Reply · Share · 15w

Lauren Noelle Takacs

Admin

Rhys Cutlan "Or your want of understanding to fit your theory?" Clearly you've no idea what we teach in this group and are already coming off as a troll.

All of your questions can be answered by using the group's search function and reading the files like everyone else does. We don't have the time to answer every single one of your questions when they've already been answered. If you don't understand it, mocking it isn't the answer. Instead, try learning and understanding it first and see what you think of it then. Otherwise, if you're not here to learn then this is not the group for you.

· Reply · Share · 15w

Belisario Martinez

The 'external cause' is always easier and faster than a deep and honest self observation. 'There must be something out there that makes me ill', so I won't let go any of my precious habits. I luuvz my daily pop&berguer, so that can't be it. Germ Theory is successful because we are gullible and lazy.

searched on https://www.pdfdrive.com/ and

archive.org

to see if I could find a free pdf of "Breakthrough The Sage of Jonas Salk" by Richard Carter

________________

THE CENTRIFUGE MACHINE AND ITS ROLE IN VACCINE MAKING.

A centrifuge is a piece of equipment, generally driven by a motor, that puts objects in rotation around a central, fixed axis, applying a force perpendicular to the axis. The equipment consists of a fixed base and a rotating component, called a rotor that holds the objects or samples to be spun.

In general, a centrifuge is useful for separating materials in certain types of mixtures. If a liquid (or solution) contains materials of different densities or widely differing molecular weights, these materials may be separable by using a centrifuge. For example, a centrifuge may be used to separate cream from milk, or to separate biological cells or VIRUS PARTICLES from suspension in a liquid. A household washing machine acts as a centrifuge during the spin cycle, when the liquid (water) is separated from the solids. (Clothing)

All virus material is separated in the centrifuge and place under an electron microscope in order to see what they call virus particles. The electron microscope is so powerful it cannot se anything alive. The question of what is virus material is essential to understand this con-game. For examples read the vaccine recipes to see what these sicko's actually use and claim it is the cause of disease.

In science always ask what are the materials and methods they use. And what type of microscope they use to se what they call virus, or antibody. This will give you the truth.

_____________

PHILADELPHIA MEDICAL TIMES.

MARCH 19, 1887.

" The first condition of such an inoculation is that the VIRUS used should be derived, directly from the disease it is intended to avert."

Jim's comment: Proof that the word virus meant poison and was the RESULT of the disease. This was called isopathy, which meant the product of disease would prevent disease. This was coined in 1823 by Dr. Joseph Lux as a tribute to Edward Jenner who died in 1823. I call that a tribute from one quack to another.

For those of you who have a hard time letting go of today's virus crap, they didn't invent the electron microscope until the 1930s. Then the liars put the PUS under that scope and claimed it was alive.

____________________

The Hygienic System

Herbert Shelton (1941)

Medicine mistakes spectacular palliation for cure---for removal of the cause. A man passes a gall stone or a kidney stone. The process is painful. As soon as the stone passes, the pain ceases, and he thinks he is cured. Not so. Cause has not been removed and another stone forms. When stones are removed from the gall bladder and the victim is dismissed as cured it is tantamount to saying the stones were the cause of the disease. Did the stone cause itself? If not, does its removal, remove the cause? If the cause is not removed is the patient cured? When a tumor is removed, does this remove cause? Is the tumor its own cause? If removing the tumor does not remove cause, is the patient cured?

The gall-bladder is opened and the stones are taken out, then the appendix is removed; then the ovaries; later the womb is taken out and, finally, part of the colon is removed. If the victim is still living, the doctor operates for a few adhesions, and interpolates serum treatments, gland treatments, sea voyages, and change of climate, ( never any change of habits) and, thus the patient passes from one disease to another and from one "cure" to "another" until cause and treatment kill her.

__________

Simon Flexner

Flexner was the first Director of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research from 1901 to 1935, His specialty was in the study of snake venom. His boss Dr. Weir Mitchell studied the toxic effect of snake venom on humans.

Simon Flexner is credited with transferring polio from a human to a monkey. When I ask people how that was possible, they respond with, well he must have put the poliovirus in their nose or fed it to them. That would be sick enough, but here is what they don't want you to know.

In 1910 Simon Flexner and Paul Lewis cut out the spinal cord of a child who died of infantile paralysis. They put the child's spinal cord in a salt solution and turned it into a liquid. Then they cut a hole in the monkey's head and injected the liquid spinal cord into the brain of the monkey.

Jim's comment. This was the beginning of the greatest medical fraud of all time. The idea of taking diseased organs and injecting infection into healthy animals had nothing to do with how humans developed disease.

In Flexner's own words, " This virus (liquid fluid) has been derived from inoculations of nasopharyngeal secretions of brain substance at autopsy." Flexner said that the infection he created in an animal's brain was no different than the infection in a person who had the disease naturally. The infection (poison) may have been the same, but the cause of the infection was not the same. The difference is creating artificial disease versus developing natural disease. Read the entire transcript.

GOOGLE NOW "EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIC POLIOMYELITIS IN MONKEYS. By SIMON FLEXNER and PAUL A. LEWIS 1910" And make a hard copy now.

_____________

_________________

Trying to compose a little list on things that are broken about the germ theory paradigm which we all take for granted. We get so many questions about the differences in terrain model and natural medicine vs germ and allopathy and why we believe the germ model is broken and allopathy is ineffective; so I thought a list might be nice - here's my list so far:

1.) Colds and flu - Germ theory claims these are caused by virus, but we know that's not true. These things are detoxification reactions which our bodies undergo with regularity when we are exposed to bad diet or bad conditions. Cold and flu are similar processes, flu is simply a deeper detox reaction

2.) Allergies - Poorly understood in germ model. Why are some people "allergic" to some substances? There's no clear answer as far as I can tell - maybe someone can weigh in. Terrain / Natural medicine approach tells us many of the items we are allergic to are simply not meant for us in the first place - this isn't an allergic reaction, it's a necessary reaction to get us to stop exposing ourselves to harmful substances

3.) Diet - Allopathy and germ theory generally believes we can eat just about anything we like and mostly need to watch calories - there are all sorts of wacky ideas about what a balanced diet is and most of these ideas will kill you and cause chronic disease. Terrain looks at our anatomy the same way we look at the anatomy of animals to find their species appropriate diet - there are many clear indicators

4.) Cancers - unless there have been recent developments I'm unaware of, allopathy and germ theory still do not understand what causes cancer. Despite the fact that naturopaths have been treating and curing cancers with diet for decades. While the exact causes of cancers may still yet be unknown, we know that if we feed ourselves an appropriate diet the rate of cancer is essentially zero and diet alone is enough to rid many people of cancers.

5.) Vaccination - vaccines contain a category of substances (often known poisons) referred as "adjuvants" - these are used in vaccine manufacturing to "irritate" the immune system which is said to help provide an enhanced immune response to the inactivated virus material which helps confer immunity. Poisons + inactivated virus = immunity is their basic idea. Terrain model and naturopathy see this as unavoidably unsafe and ineffective at disease prevention.

Happy to expand or correct the list with any future input - thanks for reading

edit 1: added numbers, added #5

____________________

THE MEDICAL AND SURGICAL REPORTER

WHOLE SERIES NO 248 PHILADELPHIA, JULY 20, 1861. NEW SERIES VOL. VI. NO. 10

By O. C. Gibbs, M.D.

ERYSIPELAS FOLLOWING VACCINATION

In the American Medical Times for June 22d, Dr. J. Lewis Smith has an article upon Infantile Erysipelas, in which allusion is made to a form of erysipelas following vaccination. Referring to several cases, the following remarks are made:

“In another instance, a well-known physician vaccinated three children-one his own, with the same virus, being careful to have the lancet clean. On the seventh day after vaccination, these were all taken with erysipelas, his own child dying. Another physician informed me that he, not long since, vaccinated with the scab two children in the same family, with all the precautions that he had ever used, and both were soon after taken with severe and pretty extensive attacks of erysipelas, extending from the point of vaccination.

We have alluded to this subject for the purpose of making a few practical remarks upon a subject of vital importance. Less than two years ago, the citizens of Westford, Mass., were excited upon the subject of small-pox, and instead of consulting the physician of their vicinity, they raised a subscription and sent to a virus peddler, in Boston, for vaccine matter. All the persons vaccinated with the virus suffered terribly with erysipelas, and quite a number died! About the same time, in San Francisco, a gentleman consulted a physician, requesting him to vaccinate his two children. Unwisely particular, he would not let the physician use matter of his own selection, but insisted on using that which he provided. The children were vaccinated, sores three inches in diameter, formed, and for thirty days the patients vacillated between life and death, but finally recovered. Most of all, in none of these cases was protection secured against small-pox, for in all probability, the vaccine disease did not occur at all. The cause of these unfortunate results is readily explainable, and might very easily have been avoided. The first scab of a vaccine sore is alone good, reliable or safe. If this is rubbed or scratched off, at about the period of its maturity, no other sore will form. It is true, the sore may inflame; pus, healthy or unhealthy, may ooze out, dry down, and form a scab. But, instead of being vaccine virus, it is dried pus, and if unhealthy, it may develop all the terrible consequences of a poisonous dissection wound. Hence the importance of all vaccinations being performed by a physician, from matter saved by himself or by his special directions. Every pains should be taken to procure positively specific lymph, and not dried, unhealthy pus for the purposes of vaccination.

Jim’s comment. The word virus from the Latin means poison. Poison is what these doctors meant when they used the word virus. The idea that virus had something so small it couldn’t be seen that caused the disease wasn’t thought of until 37 years later. The man who mistakenly believed that was Martinus Beijernick doing his tobacco plant experiments. Now a person with the condition called small-pox would develop sores. These sores would eliminate pus. The pus was the result of the disease called small-pox. So what was happening was that the body was eliminating the pus. The mistake made by the physicians at that time was they believed that the pus was the cause of the condition (disease) . Clearly when the body eliminates pus, the pus is one of the results of the disease, like a fever or stomach ache, or vomiting. Virus was just pus meaning poison the body was throwing off in order to restore health. The problem was when they took the result (pus) and scratched it in to the arm of a healthy person, sometimes that person would develop a sore. The cause of that sore was the pus the physician injected into the arm or leg. This was artificial disease, not natural disease. So we have two causes of disease, one is artificial, the other is natural. The cause of the natural small-pox was not the pus, but something else. (Filth, malnutrition etc.) So what Jenner did was to create an artificial disease by scratching pus into a healthy arm. So what we have is artificial disease and natural disease. The problem becomes more clear when you see and actual picture of a vaccination and a person with the natural condition. The vaccinated sore may resemble the natural sore at some point but they are not the same. A picture of a person covered with smallpox looks like they have hard bumps all over them. The poison injected by Jenner sometimes would cause a eating of the flesh which did not occur with the natural disease. So at any rate let’s try to figure out why the body develops a sore when pus is injected into it. Common sense says that if poison is eaten, drank or injected, the body is going to react to it. If you eat or drink poison, your body will react in several ways. Vomiting, diarrhea, or eruptions from the skin. In some cases with a strong immune system the body might just neutralize the poison and eliminate it without and ill-effects. People with different strengths and weakness of immunity would be more susceptible and exhibit different symptoms from mild to severe.

A good example of cause and effect would be the following scenario. A person eats fried food, sweets and donuts for 30 days. The person develops a severe case of pimples. These pimples develop pus. The pus dries and forms crust just like small-pox, and fall off. The body has eliminated the pus (virus poison). The person changes his diet to fruits and vegetables. The pimples don’t come back. What was the cause of the pimples? The vaccinators believed it was the pus. That it caused itself. We know the cause was the food he ate. What we don’t know is what was the food they ate in the days of famine, starvation and living in complete filth. Actually that information is available in books about living conditions in those days. So a town with a 400 population has a problem with food and filth and 50 of those people get sick and die. I can understand why the medical profession and the people thought it was caught. They were ignorant of the Laws of Nature. Which were fresh air, sunshine, good food, clean water and exercise. But what I don’t understand why the medical profession doesn’t get it now. Oh it couldn’t be money could it?

_____________________

__________________________

"Attempts to reproduce epidemic influenza in man with B. influenza have been markedly unsuccessful and the results suggest very strongly that this organism is not the primary cause of the disease".

Maitland & Cameron, Canadian Medical Association Journal, 1921.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20313164/

__________________________

THE SAME LIES THE 1918 “SPANISH FLU” ...

Autopsies after the war proved that the 1918 flu was NOT a “FLU” at all. It was caused by random dosages of an experimental ‘bacterial meningitis vaccine’, which to this day, mimics flu-like symptoms. The massive, multiple assaults with additional vaccines on the unprepared immune systems of soldiers and civilians created a “killing field”. Those that were not vaccinated were not affected.

SO… HOW DID CIVILIANS DIE?

1. WW1 ended sooner than expected, leaving HUGE quantities of unused experimental vaccines.

2. Fearing that soldiers coming home would spread diseases to their families. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐔.𝐒. 𝐠𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐧𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐩𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐥𝐚𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐬𝐭 𝐯𝐚𝐜𝐜𝐢𝐧𝐞 ‘𝐟𝐞𝐚𝐫’ 𝐜𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐢𝐠𝐧 𝐢𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲. They used the human population as a research and development lab to field test experimental vaccines.

3. Tens of millions of civilians died in the same manner as did the soldiers.

4. Instead of stopping the vaccines, doctors intensified them, calling it the great “Spanish Flu of 1918”. As a result, ONLY THE VACCINATED DIED.

“Seven men dropped dead in a doctor’s office after being vaccinated. Letters were sent to their families that they had been killed in action.”

Source: Eleanor McBean

Minnesota Wellness Directory

http://www.mnwelldir.org/.../vaccinations_condemned...

Note: The fledgling pharmaceutical industry, was sponsored by the ‘Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝟏𝟗𝟏𝟖 “𝐒𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐡 𝐅𝐥𝐮” 𝐡𝐞𝐥𝐝 𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐫 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐬 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝟏𝟎𝟎 𝐲𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐬.

𝐖𝐢𝐥𝐥 𝐰𝐞 𝐥𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝-𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐭𝐨𝐜𝐨𝐥𝐬 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐂0V1D 𝐦𝐚𝐲 𝐚𝐥𝐬𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐡𝐢𝐝𝐝𝐞𝐧 𝐬𝐞𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐭𝐬?

..................................................................................................................................

THE SPANISH INFLUENZA EPIDEMIC OF 1918 WAS CAUSED BY VACCINATIONS

As has been stated before, all medical and non-medical authorities on vaccination agree that vaccines are designed to cause a mild case of the diseases they are supposed to prevent. But they also know and admit that there is no way whatsoever to predict whether the case will be mild or severe - even deadly. With this much uncertainty in dealing with the very lives of people, it is very unscientific and extremely dangerous to use such a questionable procedure as vaccination.

Many vaccines also cause other diseases besides the one for which they are given. For instance, smallpox vaccine often causes syphilis, paralysis, leprosy, and cancer. (See the chapters on smallpox and plagues.) Polio shots, diphtheria toxin-antitoxin, typhoid vaccine, as well as measles, tetanus and all other shots often cause various other stages of disease such as post-vaccinal encephalitis (inflammation of the brain,) paralysis, spinal meningitis, blindness, cancer (sometimes within two years,) tuberculosis, (two to twenty years after the shot,) arthritis, kidney disease, heart disease (heart failure sometimes within minutes after the shot and sometimes several hours later.) Nerve damage and many other serious conditions also follow the injections.

When several shots are given (different vaccines) within a few days or a few weeks apart, they often trigger intensified cases of all the diseases at once, because the body cannot handle such a large amount of deadly poison being injected directly into the bloodstream. The doctors call it a new disease and proceed to suppress the symptoms.

When poison is taken by the mouth, the internal defense system has a chance to quickly eject some of it by vomiting, but when the poisons are shot directly into the body, bypassing all the natural safeguards, these dangerous poisons circulate immediately throughout the entire body in a matter of seconds and keep on circulating until all the cells are poisoned.

I heard that seven men dropped dead in a doctor’s office after being vaccinated. This was in an army camp, so I wrote to the Government for verification. They sent me the report of U.S. Secretary of War, Henry L. Stimson. The report not only verified the report of the seven who dropped dead from the vaccines, but it stated that there had been 63 deaths and 28,585 cases of hepatitis as a direct result of the yellow fever vaccine during only 6 months of the war. That was only one of the 14 to 25 shots given the soldiers. We can imagine the damage that all these shots did to the men. (See the chapter on What Vaccinations Did to Our Soldiers.)

The first World War was of a short duration, so the vaccine makers were unable to use up all their vaccines. As they were (and still are) in business for profit, they decided to sell it to the rest of the population. So they drummed up the largest vaccination campaign in U.S. history. There were no epidemics to justify it so they used other tricks. Their propaganda claimed the soldiers were coming home from foreign countries with all kinds of diseases and that everyone must have all the shots on the market.

The people believed them because, first of all, they wanted to believe their doctors, and second, the returning soldiers certainly had been sick. They didn’t know it was from doctor-made vaccine diseases, as the army doctors don’t tell them things like that. Many of the returned soldiers were disabled for life by these drug-induced diseases. Many were insane from postvaccinal encephalitis, but the doctors called it shell shock, even though many had never left American soil.

The conglomerate disease brought on by the many poison vaccines baffled the doctors, as they never had a vaccination spree before which used so many different vaccines. The new disease they had created had symptoms of all the diseases they had injected into the man. There was the high fever, extreme weakness, abdominal rash and intestinal disturbance characteristic of typhoid. The diphtheria vaccine caused lung congestion, chills and fever, swollen, sore throat clogged with the false membrane, and the choking suffocation because of difficulty in breathing followed by gasping and death, after which the body turned black from stagnant blood that had been deprived of oxygen in the suffocation stages. In early days they called it Black Death. The other vaccines cause their own reactions — paralysis, brain damage, lockjaw, etc.

When doctors had tried to suppress the symptoms of the typhoid with a stronger vaccine, it caused a worse form of typhoid which they named paratyphoid. But when they concocted a stronger and more dangerous vaccine to suppress that one, they created an even worse disease which they didn’t have a name for. What should they call it? They didn’t want to tell the people what it really was — their own Frankenstein monster which they had created with their vaccines and suppressive medicines. They wanted to direct the blame away from themselves, so they called it Spanish Influenza. It was certainly not of Spanish origin, and the Spanish people resented the implication that the world-wide scourge of that day should be blamed on them. But the name stuck and American medical doctors and vaccine makers were not suspected of the crime of this widespread devastation — the 1918 Flu Epidemic. It is only in recent years that researchers have been digging up the facts and laying the blame where it belongs.

Some of the soldiers may have been in Spain before coming home, but their diseases originated in their own home-based U.S. Army Camps. Our medical men still use that same dodge. When their own vaccines (required for travel) cause vaccine diseases abroad they use this as grounds for a scare campaign to stampede people into the vaccination centers. Do you remember the Hong Kong Flu and the Asian Flu and the London Flu scares? These were all medically-made epidemics mixed with the usual common colds which people have every year.

Now (1976) we are being worked on again by the vaccine -epidemic makers in their effort to force another multi million dollar vaccine sale caper. Their con men have already talked President Ford into handing over $135 million dollars to start their vaccine racket. Even the insurance companies refused to become involved with such an obviously dangerous and crooked scheme. So, again the medical and drug con men induced the appropriate government officials to guarantee insurance against the, possible billions of dollars in law suits which could be brought against the vaccine promoters if the vaccine campaign is carried out as planned. It’s a good thing Ford was voted out of office. It’s too bad he wasn’t "dumped" before he paid the poison squad the MONEY’ to poison the whole population. However, we don’t yet know if President Carter will be any better. Will he be held in the grip of the medical and drug dictatorship? Or will he investigate — learn the truth — reverse the decisions and make the vaccine makers return the money taken from the taxpayers under false pretenses?

The statement of the swine flu vaccine promoters to the effect that the vaccine is harmless, is false, and the statement that it will protect against flu is false. Fifty-six people died after the shots, some within 48 hours. There is confusion and disagreement among the doctors about all aspects of the vaccine, from the safety and effectiveness to the necessity for it, who should have it and who should be warned against it.

Their scare-head campaign cry is that the swine flu is like the 1918 flu which killed 20,000,000 people. They don’t have any usable and provable blood samples from the 1918 flu epidemic to prove it. That was 58 years ago, and the doctors were just as confused and inefficient then as now. However, one thing is certain — the 1918 Spanish Influenza was a vaccine-induced disease caused by extreme body poisoning from the conglomeration of many different vaccines. The soldiers at Fort Dix who were said to have had Swine Flu had been injected with a large variety of vaccines like the vaccines which caused the 1918 flu epidemic. The flu epidemic at Fort Dix was in no way related to swine. There were no swine at camp (unless we want to sarcastically call the vaccine promoters who caused the diseases -"swine.")

To add to the confusion, the doctors tell the people that there are a lot of various kinds of flu; the one which the soldiers at Fort Dix had was AVictoria flu, there are other strains of flu virus, and also, that the swine flu vaccine which so many people have taken already will not protect them against the many other types of flu. This will be used as an "out" in case of law suits later on when more casualties begin to show up. The doctors will say that the vaccine failed because it was the wrong kind of flu for the vaccine. Of course, no one can prove it one way or the other because viruses are illusive, invisible organisms which are unstable and unpredictable. One dictionary definition of virus is "a morbid poison." The vaccines injected into the body are poison and cause the typical poison reactions. Virus (poison) does not fly around and attack people.

Therefore, there will be no swine flu epidemic unless the vaccine promoters make one like they did in the 1918 flu epidemic. It will not kill 20,000,000 people unless the people submit to the disease-producing shots. There are also, other causes of disease besides vaccines, such as bad food, which has been devitalized and contaminated with poison preservatives and artificial drug concoctions. There are many more causes of disease but no diseases are contagious(See the chapter on the germ theory).

Vaccine drives come and go as often as the vaccine promoters can cook up the slightest pretense of a reason.n Back in1957 they were trying to stir up a vaccination campaign for what they decided to call Asiatic flu. An editorial in the Herald and Express for August 29, 1957 was captioned, "Fear of Flu Propaganda." Part of the piece is as follows:

"What a tempest in a teapot has been blown up over the probability that this country will experience an epidemic of the Asiatic flu in the fall and winter months ahead.

"Even the United States Department of Health is stooge for the panic — and has issued statements which are frightening the public, rather than reassuring them by pointing out that this epidemic, while widespread, gives no indication of being any more dangerous than our usual flood of influenza-like colds when winter comes on.

"Those who read between the lines even wonder whether the whole thing might not be a bit of super salesmanship on the part of those who are making and selling the vaccines which are being prepared.. . ."

I WAS AN ON-THE-SPOT OBSERVER OF THE 1918 INFLUENZA EPIDEMIC

All the doctors and people who were living at the time of the 1918 Spanish Influenza epidemic say it was the most terrible disease the world has ever had. Strong men, hale and hearty, one day would be dead the next. The disease had the characteristics of the black death added to typhoid, diphtheria, pneumonia, smallpox, paralysis and all the diseases the people had been vaccinated with immediately following World War 1. Practically the entire population had been injected "seeded" with a dozen or more diseases — or toxic serums. When all those doctor-made diseases started breaking out all at once it was tragic.

That pandemic dragged on for two years, kept alive with the addition of more poison drugs administered by the doctors who tried to suppress the symptoms. As far as I could find out, the flu hit only the vaccinated. Those who had refused the shots escaped the flu. My family had refused all the vaccinations so we remained well all the time. We knew from the health teachings of Graham, Trail, Tilden and others, that people cannot contaminate the body with poisons without causing disease.

When the flu was at its peak, all the stores were closed as well as the schools, businesses — even the hospital, as the doctors and nurses had been vaccinated too and were down with the flu. No one was on the streets. It was like a ghost town. We seemed to be the only family which didn’t get the flu; so my parents went from house to house doing what they could to look after the sick, as it was impossible to get a doctor then. If it were possible for germs, bacteria, virus, or bacilli to cause disease, they had plenty of opportunity to attack my parents when they were spending many hours a day in the sick rooms. But they didn’t get the flu and they didn’t bring any germs home to attack us children and cause anything. None of our family had the flu — not even a sniffle— and it was in the winter with deep snow on the ground.

When I see people cringe when someone near them sneezes or coughs, I wonder how long it will take them to find out that they can’t catch it — whatever it is. The only way they can get a disease is to develop it themselves by wrong eating, drinking, smoking or doing some other things which cause internal poisoning and lowered vitality. All diseases are preventable and most of them are cureable with the right methods, not known to medical doctors, and not all drugless doctors know them either.

It has been said that the 1918 flu epidemic killed 20,000,000 people throughout the world. But, actually, the doctors killed them with their crude and deadly treatments and drugs. This is a harsh accusation but it is nevertheless true, judging by the success of the drugless doctors in comparison with that of the medical doctors.

While the medical men and medical hospitals were losing 33% of their flu cases, the non-medical hospitals such as BATTLE CREEK, KELLOGG and MACFADDEN’S HEALTH-RESTORIUM were getting almost 100% healings with their water cure, baths, enemas, etc., fasting and certain other simple healing methods, followed by carefully worked out diets of natural foods. One health doctor didn’t lose a patient in eight years. The very successful health treatment of one of those drugless doctors who didn’t lose any patients will be given in the other part of this book, titled VACCINATION CONDEMNED, to be published a little later.

If the medical doctors had been as advanced as the drugless doctors, there would not have been those 20 million deaths from the medical flu treatment.

There was seven times more disease among the vaccinated soldiers than among the unvaccinated civilians, and the diseases were those they had been vaccinated against. One soldier who had returned from overseas in 1912 told me that the army hospitals were filled with cases of infantile paralysis and he wondered why grown men should have an infant disease. Now, we know that paralysis is a common after-effect of vaccine poisoning. Those at home didn’t get the paralysis until after the world-wide vaccination campaign in 1918.

https://archive.org/details/SwineFluExposeEleanoraMcBean1977

https://www.wdgann.com/.../swine-flu-expose-by-eleanor...

Swine Flu Expose by Eleanor McBean Ph.D-softcover – WD Gann, Inc

Swine Flu Expose by Eleanor McBean Ph.D-softcover – WD Gann, Inc

ttps://www.wdgann.com/products/swine-flu-expose-by-eleanor-mcbean-ph-d-softcover?variant=32019705266273&fbclid=IwAR0_cseIcVctmkBTHZxMAQv5raTdnqFozrMI8nlpQPOfUgldnvBK_5AtpUk

www.mnwelldir.org/.../vaccinations_condemned?fbclid=IwAR2gFNQkyOjhOTJ-gsANVv-AfRA9GsiBcLZ4ciHV9TZdRIixfLFRQR25mT4

Our man Okelly was all over the Pus and the Pox issue. Deserves a blog of its own.

Small-pox. Pus is the virus (shotsoftruth.com)

ww.shotsoftruth.com/?fbclid=IwAR1xGR8c6MCb7E01cbUTA_sK365VAPB4XxrEsfTZx1LOQjOv2doypoau5l0