YOU WILL OWN NOTHING...AND BE HAPPY?
Updated: Aug 7, 2021
"“There is one thing more wicked in the world than the desire to command and that is the will to obey...” - William Kingdon Clifford .
Less than two weeks ago, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) managing director called for a “new Bretton Woods moment.” Meanwhile, the IMF is not the only entity pushing for a “great reset,” as the World Economic Forum (WEF) and other mainstream entities have been promoting the financial reboot propaganda.
"The pandemic will certainly heighten our focus on hygiene. A new obsession with cleanliness will particularly entail the creation of new forms of packaging. We will be encouraged not to touch the products we buy. Simple pleasures like smelling a melon or squeezing a fruit will be frowned upon and may even become a thing of the past.”[4]
-The Great Reset Covid 19
“The tools of the fourth industrial revolution enable new forms of surveillance and other means of control that run counter to healthy, open societies.”[2]
For a case in point, an editorial published by the publication, Winter Oak, calls the new trend Schwab’s “fascist reset.”
“This new fascism is today being advanced in the guise of global governance, biosecurity, the ‘New Normal,’ the ‘New Deal for Nature’ and the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution,’” explains the Winter Oak article.
The author adds:
“The original fascist project, in Italy and Germany, was all about a merger of state and business. While communism envisages the take-over of business and industry by the government, which – theoretically – acts in the interests of the people, fascism was all about using the state to protect and advance the interests of the wealthy elite.” - - https://news.bitcoin.com/south-african-regulator-raids-home-of-key-members-of-an-alleged-crypto-ponzi-scheme/
Incase you missed it, the 3 groups that met in NY, NY, on October 2019 called Event 201 that laid out the response to the next global pandemic, aim to gain more than a boost in their dividense. St. John Hopkins University (the only represent from the medical establishment, the World Ecconomic Forum, whos head Klauss Schwabb has been outspoken and the spear head of a complete make over of the world ecconomy and everything under the sun, and has laid his ideals in the book he orignially wrote over 30 years "The Great Reset" and recently retitled "The Great Reset Covid 19", including Quotes such as "You will own nothing and you will be happy", and of course the our benevolant beron The Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, who polio vaccine was is documented to have paralized over 500k children in the counrty of India, and whom invested a large amount into the Covid 19 mRNA platforms being paraded as a vaccine. Bill Gates is said to become the first Trillionare after this crisis and is already making suggestions on food and climate and other areas he is not schooled in.
From "Event 201 The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences." Its so suspect the first link in the text read this parry
"Statement about nCoV and our pandemic exercise In October 2019, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security hosted a pandemic tabletop exercise called Event 201 with partners, the World Economic Forum and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Recently, the Center for Health Security has received questions about whether that pandemic exercise predicted the current novel coronavirus outbreak in China. To be clear, the Center for Health Security and partners did not make a prediction during our tabletop exercise. For the scenario, we modeled a fictional coronavirus pandemic, but we explicitly stated that it was not a prediction.
(As my friend used to say often... "yeah sure", and they are right, I mean planned is different that predicted. DIDNT WANT TO LIE...?)
Instead, the exercise served to highlight preparedness and response challenges that would likely arise in a very severe pandemic. We are not now predicting that the nCoV-2019 outbreak will kill 65 million people. Although our tabletop exercise included a mock novel coronavirus, the inputs we used for modeling the potential impact of that fictional virus are not similar to nCoV-2019."
Why the WEF’s ‘Great Reset’ is a utopian ideal: Rex van Schalkwyk, FMF 16th December 2020 by Claire Badenhorst.
‘The Great Reset’ is a plan drawn up by the World Economic Forum (WEF), an annual conference for high-profile individuals from business and politics. It explores how countries could recover from the economic damage caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. WEF Founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab and Thierry Malleret have even penned a book, titled, ‘COVID-19: The Great Reset’, which looks at how “the coronavirus crisis has wrought economic disruption on a monumental scale, contributing to a dangerous and volatile global upheaval – politically, socially and geopolitically – while raising deep concerns about the environment and the extending reach of technology into our lives.
” Since it was first mentioned, the Great Reset has sparked conspiracy theories and alarm. Fears are that a group of global leaders are using the pandemic to introduce a range of sinister and damaging socialist and environmental policies. Retired judge Rex van Schalkwyk, writing for the Free Market Foundation, assesses the concept. – Claire Badenhorst
You will own nothing and you will be happy By Rex van Schalkwyk*
Klaus Schwab is the principal driver of that orgy of privilege and opulence; the grandiosely titled World Economic Forum, held annually at the Swiss resort town of Davos. He and only a very few others, including notables such as George Soros, have a formula for what has come to be known as the Great Reset. We – the eight billion of us making up the remainder – have not been consulted, nor even considered, in this bold experiment in social engineering. We are the pieces on the board with no purpose other than to suffer an inevitable fate at the hands of a self-appointed elect.
The mantra, unfamiliar to many and soon to become a universal slogan, is encapsulated in a simple promise of happiness to be experienced equally by all. You will own nothing and you will be happy. This is so eerily similar to the promise of the utopian ideal of Karl Marx and Vladimir Ulyanov Lenin as to be indistinguishable.
Utopianism has been a social challenge for many generations. Few utopians however grasp the practical implications of their ideal, which involves the twin issues of production and consumption. It is likely, of course, that in the brave new world of no ownership all the productive work will be done by robots so that toil and even intellectual engagement will become redundant. But what of consumption? In the previous century there was one person, a philosopher no less, who attempted a practical solution to the question of consumption (of food, if not of the other essentials for life).
Bertrand Russell came up with this idea.
At the start, when individuals become cyphers and nations cease to exist, an audit will be held to determine the population of each community. A central authority will be tasked with the responsibility of keeping the records and will distribute the world’s food production in accordance with the needs allocation determined by that authority. Thereafter the food distribution will be done to accord with the pre-determined population audit, adjusted by an appropriate formula.
Any community which increased its population in excess of that determination would not receive more food on that account. In this way obedience to a novel method of population control will have been achieved. The method: starvation. It is interesting that many of the one-worlders like the Rockefellers, Bill Gates and Henry Kissinger, have made no secret of their opinion that the world is overpopulated. Now, it is proposed that a compulsory vaccination certificate, and even an implanted identity chip, be implemented as additional methods of population control.
The liberal triad was formulated in this way by John Locke: Life, liberty and property. He understood, very well, as does Klaus Schwab, that the liberated individual is owner also of life and property. Deprive an individual of his property and he is deprived of his liberty. Murray Rothbard has described liberty as self-ownership: the liberated individual owns his person as well as what he does with that person, including the productive effort made. Anything accumulated as a result of that enterprise becomes an integrated part of that individual. It is only by violating the liberty of the individual and of his person that ownership can involuntarily be taken. This must inevitably involve violence, or the threat of violence. https://www.biznews.com/thought-leaders/2020/12/16/great-reset-fmf?fbclid=IwAR1L-y_5xe-21uUjVWJVIFmvQO-tc7xqUKYzJWBSsL-gxnIxlX90RcY54KA#:~:text=Why%20the%20WEF’s%20‘Great%20Reset’%20is%20a%20utopian,the%20economic%20damage%20caused%20by%20the%20Covid-19%20pandemic
Former Vatican Insider Says “The Great Reset” Will Be Used To “Drastically Limit” Human Freedom
The former Secretary-General of the Governorate of Vatican City State, Carlo Maria Viganò, wrote a second letter to Donald Trump concerning the "The Great Reset" initiative, expressing that it's being used to take away our rights and freedoms. The Great Reset is an initiative created by the World Economic Forum. The House of Windsor (Royal Family) and the United Nations (UN) are prime executive co-producers of the plan, and top sponsors include BP, Mastercard and Microsoft. According to them: There is an urgent need for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct consequences of the COVID-19 crisis. To improve the state of the world, the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset Initiative.
They go on to explain all of the disruptions we are facing in our current COVID climate are: “changing the traditional context for decision making. The inconsistencies, inadequacies and contradictions of multiple systems – from health and financial to energy, environment and education – are more exposed than ever amidst a global context of concern for lives, livelihoods and the planet.”
This ‘Great Reset’ plan has come under fire by many, seeing it as an initiative under the guise of good will to maintain and empower, as Dr. Vandana Shiva calls it, “a corporate extraction machine and the private ownership of life.”
What Happened: The former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America, Carlo Maria Viganò previously served as Secretary-General of the Governorate of Vatican City State has also raised concerns.
A few months ago he wrote a letter to President Donald Trump bringing up what he called the “deep state,” as well as the idea that the COVID pandemic has been one giant “social engineering experiment.”
He recently penned another letter to Trump, this time it was about The Great Reset: A global plan called the Great Reset is underway. Its architect is a global élite that wants to subdue all of humanity, imposing coercive measures with which to drastically limit individual freedoms and those of entire populations. In several nations this plan has already been approved and financed; in others it is still in an early stage. Behind the world leaders who are the accomplices and executors of this infernal project, there are unscrupulous characters who finance the World Economic Forum and Event 201, promoting their agenda.
The purpose of the Great Reset is the imposition of a health dictatorship aiming at the imposition of liberticidal measures, hidden behind tempting promises of ensuring a universal income and cancelling individual debt. The price of these concessions from the International Monetary Fund will be the renunciation of private property and adherence to a program of vaccination against Covid-19 and Covid-21 promoted by Bill Gates with the collaboration of the main pharmaceutical groups. Beyond the enormous economic interests that motivate the promoters of the Great Reset, the imposition of the vaccination will be accompanied by the requirement of a health passport and a digital ID, with the consequent contact tracing of the population of the entire world. Those who do not accept these measures will be confined in detention camps or placed under house arrest, and all their assets will be confiscated. You can access and read the entire letter here. According to Ellen Brown, an attorney and chair of the Public Banking Institute: “No country will be allowed to opt out because it would be endangering the rest…Who is behind the Great Reset and what it really entails are major questions that need their own article, but suffice it to say here that to escape the trap of the globalist agenda, we need a mass awakening to what is really going on and collective resistance to it while there is still time. There are hopeful signs that this is happening, including massive protests against economic shutdowns and restrictions, particularly in Europe; a rash of lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the lockdowns and of police power overreach; and a flood of alternative media exposés despite widespread censorship. Life as we know it will change. We need to ensure that it changes in ways that serve the people and the productive economy, while preserving our national sovereignty and hard-won personal freedoms.” Why This Matters: Perspectives like this are often deemed as “conspiracy theories” by the mainstream, and many onlookers follow suit to this cultural explanation. But is this not worth discussing on a larger level? I recently wrote an article diving deep as to why such thoughts regarding The Great Rest and a “New World Order” are far from a conspiracy theory and are worthy of legitimate discussion: “COVID-19: A Precursor To A ‘New World Order?’ aka “The Great Reset.“ It feels as though it is time we must pull ourselves out of this adolescents, dismissive culture when it comes to these ideas, and begin looking at what they truly are. My invitation here is, why are these topics not more widely discussed and critiqued? Why are they always deemed a conspiracy theory and constantly ridiculed? Sure, there may be aspects of the population that will agree with The Great Reset the way it is being presented, and it’s important to empathize with these individuals because we need to understand where they are coming from, and why they feel that way. But, it’s just as important for these people to empathize with the thoughts shared in this article, and the one linked above, to understand where another huge aspect of this population is coming from and why they feel more authoritarian control is not necessarily the incredible future humanity is capable of. Only then can we start understanding one another and start having real discussions. This is far better than constantly being divided all the time. One thing is for certain, if we are constantly arguing with each other and believing those with opposing viewpoints are incapable of reasoning and examining evidence, we are not going to get anywhere. Nobody is stupid. It doesn’t matter so much whether or not we agree that something like The Great Reset is planned conspiracy, it’s more important to deeply ask: is this the world we truly want to create? Is this what we are limited to creating, and if not, what holds us back? What power would we have if as a collective to come together and do something? If we don’t want people who don’t truly represent us to have tremendous amounts of power, then we have to wake up and realize that it’s not them who has to change, it’s us.
https://www.collective-evolution.com/2020/11/14/former-vatican-insider-says-the-great-reset-will-be-use-to-drastically-limit-human-freedom/?fbclid=IwAR1vfckbu17nhtBMm0KQF1dKxwmKYcLv0GOZl5lAmBWEi4zRQSNkqMFd7z8
In an article from june 2020, Klaus Schwab argues :
[T]he world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions. Every country, from the United States to China, must participate, and every industry, from oil and gas to tech, must be transformed. In short, we need a “Great Reset” of capitalism.
Schwab continues :
The Great Reset agenda would have three main components. The first would steer the market toward fairer outcomes. To this end, governments should improve coordination (for example, in tax, regulatory, and fiscal policy), upgrade trade arrangements, and create the conditions for a “stakeholder economy.” At a time of diminishing tax bases and soaring public debt, governments have a powerful incentive to pursue such action.
Moreover, governments should implement long-overdue reforms that promote more equitable outcomes. Depending on the country, these may include changes to wealth taxes, the withdrawal of fossil-fuel subsidies, and new rules governing intellectual property, trade, and competition.
...The second component of a Great Reset agenda would ensure that investments advance shared goals, such as equality and sustainability. Here, the large-scale spending programs that many governments are implementing represent a major opportunity for progress. The European Commission, for one, has unveiled plans for a €750 billion ($826 billion) recovery fund. The US, China, and Japan also have ambitious economic-stimulus plans.
...The third and final priority of a Great Reset agenda is to harness the innovations of the Fourth Industrial Revolution to support the public good, especially by addressing health and social challenges. During the COVID-19 crisis, companies, universities, and others have joined forces to develop diagnostics, therapeutics, and possible vaccines; establish testing centers; create mechanisms for tracing infections; and deliver telemedicine. Imagine what could be possible if similar concerted efforts were made in every sector.
Schwab concludes :
[T]he pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future.
Could it be that a global pandemic was declared with the explicit goal of triggering such a “Great Reset”? Could it be that all these lockdowns and other draconian measures were taken not to help us survive a pandemic, but to weaken our economy and instill fear on a global scale, to convince the public that such a “Reset” is necessary?
2020 : From great pandemic to Great Reset
Remember the “Lock Step” scenario mentioned at the start of this article? Well, consider a prediction made by Cognizant in a white paper on how our life will look like 3 years from now :
Pre-COVID-19, legislation such as GDPR in Europe, POPI in South Africa and APPI in Japan had emerged, based on a recognition that personal data was a new source of economic wealth and that this wealth was accruing to a small number of large technology companies — not to the providers of that data.
The need to stop the virus, however, overruled misgivings about data privacy, and leaders in Israel, China and South Korea forged ahead with sophisticated monitoring policies, particularly after initial exhortations to practice social distancing and self isolation fell on deaf ears. What had seemed like calls for good old-fashioned common sense were ignored by those without it — especially younger individuals, who continued to gather in groups, use public transport (still running for essential workers) and socialize as though nothing was wrong.
The white paper continues :
Some said the introduction of Black Mirror-style social monitoring was only a temporary, necessary phenomenon — that this type and level of surveillance would end as the crisis waned. History, though, paints a very different picture. […] What terrifies many is that it isn’t just clicks and likes that are analyzed but also our health, movement and biometric data that — when combined — can be used (is being used) to not just see what you look at but how you physically respond to this input, as well. Put simply, our very emotions are now capable of being tracked and analyzed.
Of course, during the COVID-19 crisis, surveillance sounded sensible, but the road to hell is paved with good intentions. In a post-virus age, are we finally seeing the true death of privacy?
https://johnslegers.medium.com/the-4th-industrial-revolution-the-great-reset-and-covid-19-2b38d3d66d9e
The biggest downside to the $Dollar losing its reserve currency position is hyper-inflation
...China was using $50Billion to buy a new IMF issued SDR and other countries were following suit.
I couldn't figure out how this could work, until now. It turns out Yves was correct. An open world economy needs a world currency. An international currency called the BANCOR is being discussed by the IMF:
Reserve Accumulation and International Monetary Stability
This is how owners of bonds in the basket, the SDR, can "cash out". They can use their dollars to buy IMF SDRs, and then receive BANCORS to trade with the world.
This move would eliminate the US Dollar as the world's reserve currency.
The biggest downside to the $Dollar losing its reserve currency position is hyper-inflation…
Https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2011/11/9/1034814/-?fbclid=IwAR2R09-BngUwG7-Cq7fk_7pNykhDdW3lSgbH1N7FBtizTIcRjDfRXahzuTw
Schwab set out this agenda back in 1971, in his book Moderne Unternehmensführung im Maschinenbau (Modern Enterprise Management in Mechanical Engineering), where his use of the term “stakeholders” (die Interessenten) effectively redefined human beings not as citizens, free individuals or members of communities, but as secondary participants in a massive commercial enterprise. The aim of each and every person’s life was “to achieve long-term growth and prosperity” for this enterprise – in other words, to protect and increase the wealth of the capitalist elite. This all became even clearer in 1987, when Schwab renamed his European Management Forum the World Economic Forum.
The WEF describes itself on its own website as “the global platform for public-private cooperation”, with admirers describing how it creates “partnerships between businessmen, politicians, intellectuals and other leaders of society to ‘define, discuss and advance key issues on the global agenda’.”
The “partnerships” which the WEF creates are aimed at replacing democracy with a global leadership of hand-picked and unelected individuals whose duty is not to serve the public, but to impose the rule of the 1% on that public with as little interference from the rest of us as possible.
In the books Schwab writes for public consumption, he expresses himself in the two-faced clichés of corporate spin and greenwashing.
The same empty terms are dished up time and time again. In Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: A Guide to Building a Better World Schwab talks of “the inclusion of stakeholders and the distribution of benefits” and of “sustainable and inclusive partnerships” which will lead us all to an “inclusive, sustainable and prosperous future”! (1)
Behind this bluster, the real motivation driving his “stakeholder capitalism”, which he was still relentlessly promoting at the WEF’s 2020 Davos conference, is profit and exploitation.
For instance, in his 2016 book The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Schwab writes about the Uberisation of work and the consequent advantages for companies, particularly fast-growing start-ups in the digital economy: “As human cloud platforms classify workers as self-employed, they are—for the moment—free of the requirement to pay minimum wages, employer taxes and social benefits”. (2)
The same capitalist callousness shines through in his attitude towards people nearing the end of their working lives and in need of a well-deserved rest: “Aging is an economic challenge because unless retirement ages are drastically increased so that older members of society can continue to contribute to the workforce (an economic imperative that has many economic benefits), the working-age population falls at the same time as the percentage of dependent elders increases”. (3)
Everything in this world is reduced to economic challenges, economic imperatives and economic benefits for the ruling capitalist class.
The myth of Progress has long been used by the 1% to persuade people to accept the technologies designed to exploit and control us and Schwab plays on this when he declares that “the Fourth Industrial Revolution represents a significant source of hope for continuing the climb in human development that has resulted in dramatic increases in quality of life for billions of people since 1800”. (4)
KS Time magHe enthuses: “While it may not feel momentous to those of us experiencing a series of small but significant adjustments to life on a daily basis, it is not a minor change—the Fourth Industrial Revolution is a new chapter in human development, on a par with the first, second and third Industrial Revolutions, and once again driven by the increasing availability and interaction of a set of extraordinary technologies”. (5)
But he is well aware that technology is not ideologically neutral, as some like to claim. Technologies and societies shape each other, he says. “After all, technologies are tied up in how we know things, how we make decisions, and how we think about ourselves and each other. They are connected to our identities, worldviews and potential futures. From nuclear technologies to the space race, smartphones, social media, cars, medicine and infrastructure—the meaning of technologies makes them political. Even the concept of a ‘developed’ nation implicitly rests on the adoption of technologies and what they mean for us, economically and socially”. (6)
Technology, for the capitalists behind it, has never been about social good but purely about profit, and Schwab makes it quite clear that the same remains true of his Fourth Industrial Revolution.
He explains: “Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies are truly disruptive—they upend existing ways of sensing, calculating, organizing, acting and delivering. They represent entirely new ways of creating value for organizations and citizens”. (7)
Schwab predicts: “As capabilities in this area improve, the temptation for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt ..... " {Wow this guy is a scary sci fi film - What is this ? Minority Report?)
HTtps://winteroak.org.uk/2020/10/05/klaus-schwab-and-his-great-fascist-reset/?fbclid=IwAR2Eh-RS18rgkdFrazZhDizHs5Lo0sg7eWuKaW3_ecWrHo-mbPUA-2NFQdA
As capabilities in this area improve, the temptation for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt or even possibly retrieve memories directly from people’s brains will increase. Even crossing a national border might one day involve a detailed brain scan to assess an individual’s security risk”. [1].... ..."These technologies will operate within our own biology and change how we interface with the world. They are capable of crossing the boundaries of body and mind, enhancing our physical abilities, and even having a lasting impact on life itself.”[1] No violation seems to go too far for Schwab,...
Https://off-guardian.org/2020/11/14/world-economic-forums-great-reset-plan-for-big-food-benefits-industry-not-people/?fbclid=IwAR16LltKyzcFR2FO_NmDWY5jSFcYdsayaH72l1vufu609n1kSeevMvcSLm8
BUT WAIT THERES MORE WEF’s ‘Great Reset’ Plan for Big Food is NOT good news… ...According to Frederic Leroy, a food science and biotechnology professor at University of Brussels, EAT network interacts closely with some of the biggest imitation meat companies, including Impossible Foods and other biotech companies, which aim to replace wholesome nutritious foods with genetically modified lab creations. “They frame it as healthy and sustainable, which of course it is neither,” Leroy told The Defender. Impossible Foods was initially co-funded by Google, Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates. Recent lab results showed the company’s imitation meat contained glyphosate levels 11 times higher than its closest competitor.... https://off-guardian.org/.../world-economic-forums-great.../ Ron Paul denounces the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) great reset agenda, stating, “The great reset will dramatically expand the surveillance state via real-time tracking.” “This great reset is about expanding government power and suppressing liberty worldwide” — Ron Paul As COVID-19 vaccination and immunity passports are gaining traction among governments, airlines, and entertainment venues, advocates of the great reset agenda want to use these digital surveillance devices as tools for monitoring every aspect of society. On Monday, January 4, 2021, former congressman Ron Paul denounced the great reset on his weekly column, stating, “This great reset is about expanding government power and suppressing liberty worldwide.” “Dystopian scenarios are not a fatality […] the genie of tech surveillance will not be put back into the bottle” — Klaus Schwab, WEF The digital identity agenda picked-up speed throughout 2020, starting with contact tracing and continuing with immunity passports to monitor and control citizen mobility for the greater good. After attempting to justify mass surveillance in the interest of public health and safety, Schwab wrote in “COVID-19: The Great Reset” that in the post-pandemic era “the genie of tech surveillance will not be put back in the bottle,” and that “dystopian scenarios are not a fatality.” Selected Excerpts from “COVID-19: The Great Reset” Now that information and communication technologies permeate almost every aspect of our lives and forms of social participation, any digital experience that we have can be turned into a “product” destined to monitor and anticipate our behavior. The pandemic could open an era of active health surveillance made possible by location-detecting smartphones, facial-recognition cameras and other technologies that identify sources of infection and track the spread of a disease in quasi real time. Dystopian scenarios are not a fatality. It is true that in the post-pandemic era, personal health and wellbeing will become a much greater priority for society, which is why the genie of tech surveillance will not be put back into the bottle. The combination of AI, the IoT and sensors and wearable technology will produce new insights into personal well-being. They will monitor how we are and feel, and will progressively blur the boundaries between public healthcare systems and personalized health creation systems – a distinction that will eventually break down. Freedom is a concept seldom valued among the un-elected bureaucrats when referring to the great reset agenda.
ttps://sociable.co/government-and-policy/the-great-reset-will-expand-surveillance-state-via-real-time-tracking-ron-paul/?fbclid=IwAR3yZ7PaQ4AyVj1fYo8-jizGv1Nn2Z_qZuyPi1uy9O3ih4MrrKw7mQ-DLlM
A highlighted version of what has been better know as LOCKstep by the Rockafella Foundation The-Annotated-Rockefeller-Foundation-Lockstep-2010.pdf (stopbsnow.com)
WHO (finally) admits PCR tests create false positives
Warnings concerning high CT value of tests are months too late…so why are they appearing now? The potential explanation is shockingly cynical.
Https://off-guardian.org/2020/12/18/who-finally-admits-pcr-tests-create-false-positives/?fbclid=IwAR2R09-BngUwG7-Cq7fk_7pNykhDdW3lSgbH1N7FBtizTIcRjDfRXahzuTw
Another Epidemiologist Calls Out Facebook “Fact-Checkers” & Calls It A “Scam” tps://www.collective-evolution.com/2021/03/12/another-epidemiologist-calls-out-facebook-fact-checkers-calls-it-a-scam/?fbclid=IwAR31HlR4o_d2HUlyMpW8foOJc4XuV8RJrmhZCKUMTIsTwgF_K7GgFEWLKk8
Finally, the next and last scenario narrative is called, “Smart Scramble. This is an economically depressed world in which individuals and communities develop localized, makeshift solutions to a growing set of problems.” 9 The period of time for these narratives to unfold covers a period beginning in 2010 and moves to 2015, then coincidently, it moves to 2020. Then it moves to 2025 and finally to 2030. But what does it all mean? That can be best deciphered by examining what is known as “Event 201,” 10 which is the pandemic simulation staged by Johns Hopkins University in conjunction with the World Economic Forum, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Johnson & Johnson, and others in October 2019. These presentations, as do the Lock Step Scenarios, are connected as they all relate to pandemics.
Wikipedia says that the World Economic Forum, established in 1971, is an organization that is often criticized as a wealthy global elite group without any solid connection to the broader societies they often claim they are trying to help, without financial transparency. Add to this what we have previously maintained in our articles, that the problems surrounding the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in conjunction with the WHO’s vaccine experiments on children in India, Africa, and other third world countries, have accused this duo of gross violations in medical safety. But driving the agenda to continue these experiments is the pharmaceutical industry and other health entities with a legacy of corruption. In fact, corruption is systemic throughout global health and national health agencies. This topic of corruption was featured in the prestigious medical journal, The Lancet. 11 The author, Dr. Patricia Garcia, writes, “Corruption is embedded in health systems. Throughout my life—as a researcher, public health worker, and a Minister of Health—I have been able to see entrenched dishonesty and fraud. But despite being one of the most important barriers to implementing universal health coverage around the world, corruption is rarely openly discussed.” This is why I have emphasized that the “Event 201” is the most recent and revealing example of global dubious vaccine information. It contains several slides and photographs that show that these individuals and institutions have been planning out these efforts for quite some time, while we have been busy thinking about other matters—until the coronavirus pandemic crisis hit us unexpectedly. When you put all this together, it’s hard not to convince oneself that the Lock Step Scenarios, or those events orchestrated by John Hopkins University, were only simulations. Once 5G makes surveillance of all cities a reality and we are forced to take vaccines against our wills what more can we say? Let’s also not forget to bear in mind that, the WHO, along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Anthony Fauci, who oversees the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease, are leading the efforts to develop a COVID-19 vaccine. And according to them, that vaccine, good or bad, is on the way and everybody must take it. But, who really is Bill Gates? And, why should we worry? This YouTube video, titled “How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health,” has more than 1 million views and best answers these questions. Take a moment to view it.
, Putin told Klaus Schwab and the WEF that their entire idea of the Great Reset is not only doomed to failure but runs counter to everything modern leadership should be pursuing. Putin literally laughed at the idea of the Fourth Industrial Revolution – Schwab’s idea of a planned society through AI, robots and the merging of man and machine. He flat-out told them their policies driving the middle class to the brink of extinction over the COVID-19 pandemic will further increase social and political unrest while also ensuring wealth inequality gets worse. Putin’s no flower-throwing libertarian or anything, but his critique of the hyper-financialized post-Soviet era is accurate. ttps://tomluongo.me/2021/02/10/great-reset-putin-not-so-fast/?fbclid=IwAR3sciRAndwPQEqPy4hJYM_7I0OfE3gU1Nyl-ecU9Bvy7LdqLz_1EWk-iT4
Finally, the next and last scenario narrative is called, “Smart Scramble. This is an economically depressed world in which individuals and communities develop localized, makeshift solutions to a growing set of problems.” 9 The period of time for these narratives to unfold covers a period beginning in 2010 and moves to 2015, then coincidently, it moves to 2020. Then it moves to 2025 and finally to 2030. But what does it all mean? That can be best deciphered by examining what is known as “Event 201,” 10 which is the pandemic simulation staged by Johns Hopkins University in conjunction with the World Economic Forum, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Johnson & Johnson, and others in October 2019. These presentations, as do the Lock Step Scenarios, are connected as they all relate to pandemics. Wikipedia says that the World Economic Forum, established in 1971, is an organization that is often criticized as a wealthy global elite group without any solid connection to the broader societies they often claim they are trying to help, without financial transparency. Add to this what we have previously maintained in our articles, that the problems surrounding the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation in conjunction with the WHO’s vaccine experiments on children in India, Africa, and other third world countries, have accused this duo of gross violations in medical safety. But driving the agenda to continue these experiments is the pharmaceutical industry and other health entities with a legacy of corruption. In fact, corruption is systemic throughout global health and national health agencies. This topic of corruption was featured in the prestigious medical journal, The Lancet. 11 The author, Dr. Patricia Garcia, writes, “Corruption is embedded in health systems. Throughout my life—as a researcher, public health worker, and a Minister of Health—I have been able to see entrenched dishonesty and fraud. But despite being one of the most important barriers to implementing universal health coverage around the world, corruption is rarely openly discussed.” This is why I have emphasized that the “Event 201” is the most recent and revealing example of global dubious vaccine information. It contains several slides and photographs that show that these individuals and institutions have been planning out these efforts for quite some time, while we have been busy thinking about other matters—until the coronavirus pandemic crisis hit us unexpectedly. When you put all this together, it’s hard not to convince oneself that the Lock Step Scenarios, or those events orchestrated by John Hopkins University, were only simulations. Once 5G makes surveillance of all cities a reality and we are forced to take vaccines against our wills what more can we say? Let’s also not forget to bear in mind that, the WHO, along with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and Anthony Fauci, who oversees the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease, are leading the efforts to develop a COVID-19 vaccine. And according to them, that vaccine, good or bad, is on the way and everybody must take it. But, who really is Bill Gates? And, why should we worry? This YouTube video, titled “How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health,” has more than 1 million views and best answers these questions. Take a moment to view it.
ttps://infinitebanking.org/banknotes/the-global-lock-step-scenario-part-three-the-conclusion-bill-gates-and-the-rockefeller-foundation/?fbclid=IwAR2L_-qDK4M5U9e_dgpLPTCcA5F0HNirzq0hmKbKmf1Iz7IdrxTD4Ic6SqA
The technologies of the 4IR, rolled out via 5G, pose unprecedented threats to our freedom, as Schwab concedes:
The tools of the fourth industrial revolution enable new forms of surveillance and other means of control that run counter to healthy, open societies.”[2]
But this does not stop him presenting them in a positive light, as when he declares that “public crime is likely to decrease due to the convergence of sensors, cameras, AI and facial recognition software”. [1]
He describes with some relish how these technologies “can intrude into the hitherto private space of our minds, reading our thoughts and influencing our behavior”. [1]
Schwab predicts:
As capabilities in this area improve, the temptation for law enforcement agencies and courts to use techniques to determine the likelihood of criminal activity, assess guilt or even possibly retrieve memories directly from people’s brains will increase. Even crossing a national border might one day involve a detailed brain scan to assess an individual’s security risk”. [1]
Https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/12/klaus-schwab-his-great-fascist-reset/?fbclid=IwAR2L_-qDK4M5U9e_dgpLPTCcA5F0HNirzq0hmKbKmf1Iz7IdrxTD4Ic6SqA
.
THEIR WEB SITE / AGENDA/ PAINTED IN FLOWERS
https://www.weforum.org/events/the-davos-agenda-2021
Https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/event201/
HTtps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0IiALDubQc
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaYqxYnrTfs
“You will own nothing, and you will be happy”? | The Great Reset - RUSSEL BRAND
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mD-ioJM8v64
Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HaYqxYnrTfs
USING AFRICA AS AN EXAMPLE AGAIN - NOT COOL
F.A. Hayek called “the fatal conceit” — the idea that some great mind or committee can do a better job than the private market in organizing and directing an economy. Hayek argued that the market automatically coordinates the millions of individual activities […]
...“As many as 4,000 businesspeople have been arrested, fined or jailed,” reported Wines, while “state-run newspapers publish lists of telephone numbers on their front pages daily, exhorting citizens to report merchants whose prices exceed the dictates.”
2030 Agenda https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Comments